Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Promoting Students' Learning Independence and Achievement through the Use of Virtual Chemistry Laboratory in Blended Online Learning


Affiliations
1 Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Sleman 55281, Indonesia
2 Alumnae of Master Programme of Chemistry Education, Graduate School, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Sleman 55281, Indonesia
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Since the laboratory work activity is an essential part of chemistry learning, recent studies on the effectiveness of Virtual Chemistry Laboratory (VICH-Lab) are proposed. This research aims to promote students' learning independence and achievement by implementing VICH-Lab in blended online learning of chemical equilibrium topics in a chemistry lesson. Quasi-experimental research with a post-test-only design was implemented in this research. The samples of this research cover two classes drawn from a public secondary school in Kulon Progo Regency, Indonesia. Both classes were established by the cluster random sampling technique. The students' learning independence data were collected through the Learning Independence Questionnaire (LIQ) and Observation Sheet of Learning Independence (OSLI). In contrast, the data on students' achievements were obtained through Chemical Equilibrium Test (CET). The two data types were analysed following the one-way Analysis of Variance (one-way ANOVA) technique. The analysis results indicate any significant effects of VICH-Lab in blended online learning on students' learning independence and achievement.

Thus, the VICH-Lab in blended online learning can be used as an alternative way to promote students' learning independence and achievement, especially in this pandemic covid-19 situation.


Keywords

Blended Online Learning, Chemical Equilibrium, Students' Learning Independence, Students' Achievement, Virtual Laboratory.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Abeldina, Z., Moldumarova, Z., Abeldina, R., Makysh, G., & Moldumarova, Z. (2016). Expe ri enc e in educ a tion enviroment virtualization within the automated information system "platonus" (Kazakhstan). International Journal of Enviroment & Science Education, 11 (18), 12512-12527. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1124621.pdf
  • Ali, N., & Ullah, S. (2020). Review to analyze and compare virtual chemistry laboratories for their use in education. Journal of Chemical Education, 97 (10), 3563-3574. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00185
  • Almazaydeh, L., Younes, I., & Elleithy, K. (2016). An Interactive and self-instructional virtual chemistry laboratory. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11 (07), 70–73. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i07.5853
  • American Chemical Society. (2017). Importance of hands-on laboratory science. https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/policy/publicpolicies/education/computersimulations.html
  • Balapumi, R., & Aitken, A. (2012). Concepts and factors influencing independent learning in IS higher education. 23rd Australasian Conference on Information Systems 3-5 Dec 2012, Geelong. 01-10. https://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30049160/balapumi-conceptsandfactors-2012.pdf
  • Bellindo, M. S. C., Jimenez, P. M., Pedrajaz, A. P., & Polo, J. (2003). Learning in chemistry with virtual laboratories. Chemical Education, 80(3), 346-356. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed080p346
  • Biader, U. C., Crescenzi, P., De Paoli, M., Ferraro, S., Iannucci, M., Messina, A., & Passamonti, P. (2002) Platform independent virtual laboratory system: Simulation of gradient elution HPLC. International Journal of Modelling and Simulation, 22(3), 148-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02286203.2002.11442236
  • Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers and students. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 161-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00015-1
  • Bortnik, B., Stozhko, N., Pervukhina, I., Tehernysheva, A., & Belysheva, G. (2017). Effect of virtual analytical chemistry laboratory on enhancing student research skills and practices. Research in Learning Technology, 25, 1968-1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v25.1968
  • Cahyana, U., Supatmi, S., Erdawati, & Rahmawati, Y. (2019). The Influence of webbased learning and learning independence toward student's scientific literacy in chemistry course. International Journal of Instruction, 12 (4), 655-668. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12442a
  • Danial, M., & Yunus, M. (2019). Critical thinking skills and student l e a rning independence of chemistry department undergraduate programs in lectures of chemistry education seminar through critical analysis techniques. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1317, 012151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012151
  • Daryanto. (2013). Media pembelajaran [Learning media]. Gava Media.
  • Deepa, M., Reba, P., Santhanamari, G., & Susithra, N. (2021). Enriched blended learning through virtual experience in microprocessors and microcontrollers course. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 34 (Special Issue), 642-650. http://dx.doi.org/10.16920/jeet%2F2021%2Fv34i0%2F157236
  • Diwakar, A. S., & Noronha, S. B. (2016). The effectiveness of virtual labs in engineering education - What do we measure? Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 30(1), 7 3 - 8 1 . http://dx.doi.org/10.16920/jeet%2F2016%2Fv30i1%2F97425
  • Dyrberg, N. R., Treusch, A. H., & Wiegand, C. (2016): Virtual laboratories in science education: Students' motivation and experiences in two tertiary biology courses. Journal of Biological Education, 51 (11), 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1257 498
  • Carlson, G. D. (2016). Developing community and active participation in a mixed-level language class via self-learning portfolios. Asian EFL Journal, 93, 24-41. https://asian-efl-journal.com/wp-content/uploads/AEJ-TA-90-February-2016f.pdf
  • Chan, P., Gerven, T. V., Dubois, J-L., & Bernaerts, K. (2021). Virtual chemical laboratories: A systematic literature review of research, technologies and instructional design. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100053
  • Coll, R. K., Ali, S., Bonato, J., & Rohindra, D. (2005). Investigating first-year chemistry learning difficulties in the south pacific: A case study from Fiji. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4, 365-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-005-9007-6
  • Field, R., Duffy, J., & Huggins, A. (2015). Teaching independent learning skills in the first year: A positive psychology strategy for promoting law student well-being. Journal of Learning Design, 8 (2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v8i2.238
  • Fitriyana, N., Wiyarsi, A., Ikhsan, J., & Sugiyarto, K. H. (2018). Fostering of students' self-regulated learning and achievement: A study on hydrocarbon blended online-learning and android-based-game. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1097, 012064. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012064
  • Fitriyana, N., Wiyarsi, A., Ikhsan, J. & Sugiyarto, K.H. (2020). Android-based-game and blended learning in chemistry: Effect on students' self-efficacy and achievement. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(3), 507-521. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i3.28335
  • Fitriyana, N., Wiyarsi, A., Sugiyarto, K. H., & Ikhsan, J. (2021). The influences of blended online learning with video conference and "chemondro-game" on students' self-efficacy, self-regulated learning, and achievement toward chemistry. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18 (2), 233-248. http://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/703/665
  • Hawkins, I., & Phelps, A. J. (2013). Virtual laboratory vs. traditional laboratory: which is more effective for teaching electrochemistry? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14, 516-523. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3rp00070b
  • Herga, N. R., Cagran, B., & Dinevski, D. (2016). Virtual laboratory in the role of dynamic visualisation for better understanding of chemistry in primary school. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12 (13), 593-608. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1224a
  • Ikhsan, J., Fitriyana, N., & Arif, Z. (2021). Virtual chemistry laboratory in blended online learning mode: The influence on students' motivation and achievement. Pedagogy, 144(4), 158-179. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2021.144.9
  • Jahjouh, Y. M. A. (2014). The effectiveness of blended e- learning forum in planning for science instruction. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 11 (4), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10123a
  • Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14 (7), 1-20. https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4
  • Kitsantas, A. (2013). Fostering college students' self-regulated learning with learning technologies. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 10, 235-252.
  • Khaddage, F., Muller, W., & Flintoff, K. (2016). Advancing mobile learning in formal and informal settings via mobile app technology: where to from here, and how. Journal of Educational Technology, 19(3), 16-26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.3. 16?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
  • Kolil, V. K., Muthupalani, S., & Achuthan, K. (2020). Virtual experimental platforms in chemistry laboratory education and its impact on experimental self-efficacy. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(30), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00204-3
  • Kopzhassarova, U., Akbayeva, G., Eskazinova, Z., Belgibayeva, G., & Tazhikeyeva, A. (2016). Enhancement of students' independent learning through the ircritical thinking skills development. Internationa Journal of Envromental & Science Education, 11(18), 11585-11592. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1121248.pdf
  • Kulsum, U., Kustono, D., & Purnomo. (2017). Improvement of learning independence and learning outcomes on textile course through hybrid learning model. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 22(8), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2208030105
  • Lalima, & Dangwal, K. L. (2017). Blended learning: an innovative approach. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(1), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050116
  • Latifah, Z., Ikhsan, J., & Sugiyarto, K. H. (2018). Influence of virtual chemistry laboratory utilization (V-Lab) toward self-regulated learning. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1097, 012067. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012067
  • Latifah, Z., Ikhsan, J., & Sugiyarto, K. H. (2019). Effect of virtual chemistry laboratory toward cognitive learning achievement. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1156, 012034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1156/1/012034
  • Lopez-Perez, M. V., Perez-Lopez, M. C., & Rodriguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Students' perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers & Education, 56, 818-826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.023
  • Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended Learning: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115, 1-47. https://www.sri.com/sites/default/files/publicati ons/effectiveness_of_online_and_blended_learning.pdf
  • Mooij, T., Stefens, K., & Andrade, M. S. (2014). Self-regulated and technology-enhanced learning: A european perspective. European Educational Research Journal, 13(5), 519-528. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2014.13.5.519
  • Musawi, A. S. A. (2011). Blended learning. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 8(2), 3-8. http://tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/355/295
  • Nicole, B.-M. A., & Retta, S.-G. (2006). Hybird learning defined. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5, 153-156. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ808941
  • Penn, M., & Ramnarain, U. (2019). South African university students' attitudes towards chemistry learning in a virtually simulated learning environment. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20, 699-709. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00014c
  • Priyambodo, E., Sukirno, Primastuti, M., Fitriyana, N., & Randhanugraha, H. (2021). STSE collaborative learning: Fostering students' learning motivation on electrolyte non-electrolyte chemistry unit. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 35(2), 106-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.16920/jeet%2F2021%2Fv35i2%2F155411
  • Porter, K. R., & Woerner, T. (2008). On the way to the virtual laboratory. Science & Technology Libraries, 16 (3-4), 99–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J122v16n03_07
  • Rivera, J. H. (2016). Science-based laboratory comprehension: an examination of effective practices within traditional, online and blended learning environments. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 31 (3), 209-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2016.1208080
  • Rowe, R. J., Koban, L., Davidoff, A. J., & Thompson, K. H. (2018). Efficacy of online laboratory science courses. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 2(1), 56–67.
  • Salta, K., & Tzougraki, C. (2004). Attitudes toward chemistry among 11th grade students in high schools in Greece. Science Education, 88 (4), 535-547. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10134
  • Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning difficulties in chemistry: an overiew. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(2), 2-20.
  • Sokrat, H., Tamani, S., Moutaabbid, M., & Radid, M. (2014). Difficulties of students from the faculty of science with regard to understanding the concepts of chemical thermodynamics. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 368-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.223
  • Špernjak, A., & Šorgo, A. (2017). Differences in acquired knowledge and attitudes achieved with traditional, computer-supported and virtual laboratory biology laboratory exercises. Journal of Biological Education, 52(2), 206-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2017.1298532
  • Suyanta, Laksono, E. W., Fadhilah, N. F., & Rizky, I. (2019). The effect of problem-based learning on students' self-regulated learning of chemistry learning. Jurnal Kependidikan, 3(2), 187-193.
  • Thobroni, M., & Mustofa, A. (2013). Belajar dan pembelajaran [Teaching and learning]. Ar-Ruzz Media.
  • Treagust, D., Duit, R., & Nieswandt, M. (2000). Sources of students' difficulties in learning chemistry. Educación Química, 11(2), 228-235. https://doi.org/10.22201/fq.18708404e.2000.2.66458
  • Tuysuz, C. (2010). The effect of the virtual laboratory on students' achievement and attitude in chemistry. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, II(1), 37-53. http://www.iojes.net/userfiles/article/iojes_167.pdf
  • Unnisa, A. (2016). Comparative analysis of online and blended online learning. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 30 (Special Issue), 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.16920/jeet%2F2016%2Fv0i0%2F85717
  • Wijayanti, R., Sugiyarto, K. H., & Ikhsan, J. (2019). Effectiveness of using virtual chemistry laboratory integrated blended online learning to students' learning achievement. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1156, 012031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1156/1/012031
  • Wilson, K., & Narayan, A. (2016). Relationships among individual task self-efficacy, self-regulated learning strategy use and academic performance in a computer supported collaborative learning environment. Educational Psychology, 36(2), 236-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.926312
  • Winkelmann, K., Scott, M., & Wong, D. (2014). A study of high school students' performance of virtual chemistry laboratory in Second Life. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(9), 1432–1438.
  • Winkelmann, K., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., Fowler, D., & Macik, M. (2017). Development, implementation, and assessment of general chemistry lab experiments performed in the virtual world of second life. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(7), 849–858.
  • Winkelmann, K., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., Fowler, D., Macik, M. L., Guarda, P. P., & Ahlborn, C. J. (2020). Learning gains and attitudes of students performing chemistry experiments in an immersive virtual world. Interactive Learning Environments, https://doi.org10.1080/10494820.2019.1696844
  • Wisetsat, C. & Nuangchalerm, P. (2019). Enhancing innovative thinking of Thai pre-service teachers through multi-educational innovations. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7 (3), 409-419. http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/jegys.570748
  • Woldeamanuel, M. M., Atagana, H., & Engida, T. (2014). What makes chemistry difficult? African Journal of Chemical Education, 4(2), 31-43. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajce/article/view/104070
  • Woodfield, B., Andrus, M., Andersen, T., Miller, J., Simmons, B., Stanger, R., ... Bodily, G. (2005). The Virtual ChemLab Project: Arealistic and sophisticated simulation of organic synthesis and organic qualitative analysis. Journal of Chemical Education, 82, 1728–1735.
  • Zhao, Y., & Breslow, L. (2013). Literature review on blended online/ blended learning. Teaching and Learning Laboratoies, 1-22. https://tll.mit.edu

Abstract Views: 36

PDF Views: 0




  • Promoting Students' Learning Independence and Achievement through the Use of Virtual Chemistry Laboratory in Blended Online Learning

Abstract Views: 36  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Nur Fitriyana
Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Sleman 55281, Indonesia
Jaslin Ikhsan
Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Sleman 55281, Indonesia
Angga Satria
Alumnae of Master Programme of Chemistry Education, Graduate School, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Sleman 55281, Indonesia

Abstract


Since the laboratory work activity is an essential part of chemistry learning, recent studies on the effectiveness of Virtual Chemistry Laboratory (VICH-Lab) are proposed. This research aims to promote students' learning independence and achievement by implementing VICH-Lab in blended online learning of chemical equilibrium topics in a chemistry lesson. Quasi-experimental research with a post-test-only design was implemented in this research. The samples of this research cover two classes drawn from a public secondary school in Kulon Progo Regency, Indonesia. Both classes were established by the cluster random sampling technique. The students' learning independence data were collected through the Learning Independence Questionnaire (LIQ) and Observation Sheet of Learning Independence (OSLI). In contrast, the data on students' achievements were obtained through Chemical Equilibrium Test (CET). The two data types were analysed following the one-way Analysis of Variance (one-way ANOVA) technique. The analysis results indicate any significant effects of VICH-Lab in blended online learning on students' learning independence and achievement.

Thus, the VICH-Lab in blended online learning can be used as an alternative way to promote students' learning independence and achievement, especially in this pandemic covid-19 situation.


Keywords


Blended Online Learning, Chemical Equilibrium, Students' Learning Independence, Students' Achievement, Virtual Laboratory.

References