Indian Journal of Marketing

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Why Satisfied Consumers do not Repurchase ? The Perspective of Attribution Theory on Repurchase Intention


Affiliations
1 Kyunghee University, 26 Kyungheedaero, Dondaemungu, Seoul, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
2 Department of Management, Yong In University, 134 Yongindaehak-ro, Cheoingu, Yonginsi, Gyeonggi-do 449-714, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Satisfied consumers may switch to another brand instead of repurchase. This study focused on whether the cause of satisfaction is attributed internally or externally and how these attributions can influence the repurchase intention differently among Korean consumers. The data set of 198 respondents were collected on internal and external attribution, knowledge, switching cost, and repurchase intention. The findings indicated that internal attribution did not mediate between consumer satisfaction and repurchase intention ; whereas, external attribution mediated between consumer satisfaction and repurchase intention. Second, consumers with high knowledge had a positive influence on repurchase intention through external attribution rather than internal attribution. Lastly, satisfied consumers had a positive effect on repurchase intention for those who attributed internally only if they perceived the switching cost. The study provided strategies for satisfied consumers with their purchased products who may not necessary repurchase. Furthermore, marketers should consider developing new products with unique and new properties or functions by managing the knowledge level of consumers. This research indicated for the first time that external attribution mediates between satisfaction and repurchase intention ; whereas, internal attribution does not mediate between satisfaction and repurchase intention.

Keywords

Satisfaction, Repurchase Intention, Attribution Theory, Knowledge, Switching Cost.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Agarwal, A., & Singh, M. R. (2018). The relationship between retail experience, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intention : Exploring the consumer shopping behavior in unorganized retail settings. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(1), 9 – 27. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i1/120733

  • Ahrholdt, D. C., Gudergan, S. P., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Enhancing loyalty : When improving consumer satisfaction and delight matters. Journal of Business Research,94, 18 – 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.040

  • Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 411 – 454. https://doi.org/10.1086/209080

  • Bell, S. J., Auh, S., & Smalley, K. (2005). Customer relationship dynamics : Service quality and customer loyalty in the context of varying levels of customer expertise and switching costs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(2), 169 – 183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070304269111

  • Bettman, J. R., & Park, C. W. (1980). Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes : A protocol analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(3), 234 – 248. https://doi.org/10.1086/208812

  • Blut, M., Frennea, C. M., Mittal, V., & Mothersbaugh, D. L. (2015). How procedural, financial and relational switching costs affect customer satisfaction, repurchase intentions, and repurchase behavior : A metaanalysis.International Journal of Research in Marketing,32(2),226–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.01.001

  • Bowen, J. T., & Chen, S. L. (2001). The relationship between customer loyalty and customer satisfaction. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 13(5), 213–217. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596110110395893

  • Burnham, T. A., Frels, J. K., & Mahajan, V. (2003). Consumer switching costs : A typology, antecedents, and consequences.Academy of Marketing Science, 31(2),109–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070302250897

  • Chang, C. (2004).The interplay of product class knowledge and trial experience in attitude formation. Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 83 – 92. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2004.10639156

  • Chen, M. - F., & Li, H. - L. (2007). The consumer’s attitude toward genetically modified foods in Taiwan. Food Quality and Preference, 18(4), 662 – 674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.10.002

  • Choi, S., & Mattila, A. S. (2008). Perceived controllability and service expectations: Influences on customer reactions following service failure. Journal of Business Research, 61 (1),24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.05.006

  • Cooil, B., Keiningham, T. L., Aksoy, L., & Hsu, M. (2007). A longitudinal analysis of customer satisfaction and share of wallet : Investigating the moderating effect of customer characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 67 – 83. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.71.1.67

  • Dixon, A. L., Spiro, R. L., & Jamil, M. (2001). Successful and unsuccessful sales calls: Measuring salesperson attributions and behavioral intentions. Journal of Marketing ,65(3),64–78 . https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.65.3.64.18333

  • Fabrigar, L. R., Petty, R. E., Smith, S. M., & Crities, S. L. Jr. (2006). Understanding knowledge effects on attitude behavior consistency: The role of relevance, complexity, and amount of knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 556 – 577. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.556

  • Festinger, L. A. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. CA: Stanford University Press.

  • Flynn, L. R., & Goldsmith, R. E. (1999). A short, reliable measure of subjective knowledge. Journal of Business Research, 46(1), 57 – 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0148-2963(98)00057-5

  • Folkes, V. S. (1984). Consumer reactions to product failure : An attributional approach. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(4), 398 – 409. https://doi.org/10.1086/208978

  • Garbarino, E., & Johnson, M. S. (1999). The different roles of satisfaction, trust, and commitment in customer relationships. Journal of Marketing, 63(2), 70 – 87. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299906300205

  • Harrell, S. G., & Taylor, E. D. (1981). Modeling the product life cycle for consumer durables. Journal of Marketing, 45(4), 68 – 75. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251473

  • Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. NY: Guilford Publications.

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relation. New York: Wiley.

  • Helgesen, O. (2010). Are loyal customers profitable ? Customer satisfaction, customer (action) loyalty and customer profitability at the individual level. Journal of Marketing Management, 22(3–4), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725706776861226

  • Herr, P. M., Kardes, F. R., & Kim, J. (1991). Effects of word - of - mouth and product - attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility diagnosticity perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 454 – 462. https://doi.org/10.1086/208570

  • Iglesias, V. (2009). The attribution of service failures: Effects on consumer satisfaction. Service Industries Journal, 29(2), 127 – 141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060802293088

  • Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions - The attribution process in person perception. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 219 –266. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60107-0

  • Jones, M. A., Mothersbaugh, D. L., & Beatty, S. E. (2000). Switching barriers and repurchase intentions in services.

  • Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 259 – 274. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-4359(00)00024-5 Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457 – 501. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002325

  • Koklic, M. K., Kukar - Kinney, M., & Vegelj, S. (2017). An investigation of customer satisfaction with low-cost and full-serviceair line companies. Journal of Business Research ,80,188–196 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.05.015

  • Kopalle, P. K., & Lehmann, D. R. (2001). Strategic management of expectations : The role of disconfirmation sensitivity and perfectionism. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(3), 386–394. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.3.386.18862

  • Kumar, S. S., & Menon, R. P. (2017). Brand loyalty of customers in smartphone brands. Indian Journal of Marketing, 47(3), 8 – 15. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2017/v47/i3/111417

  • Kurup, A. J., & Jain, P. (2018). Effect of e-loyalty cues on repurchase behavioural intentions among online shoppers. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(11), 7 – 22. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i11/137982

  • Liefeld, J. P. (2004). Consumer knowledge and use of country - of - origin information at the point of purchase. Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, 4 (2),85–87 . https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.161

  • Mittal, V., & Kamakura, W. A. (2001). Satisfaction, repurchase intent, and repurchase behavior : Investigating the moderating effect of customer characteristics. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(1), 131 – 142. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.1.131.18832

  • Morewedge, C. K., Shu, L. L., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2009). Bad riddance or good rubbish ? Ownership and not loss aversion causes the endowment effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 947 – 951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.05.014

  • Muller, M. (2010). Loyal customers don’t quit... Satisfied customers do. MM Research. Retrieved from https://mmresearch.com/customer+satisfaction+article

  • Nagengast, L., Evanschitzky, H., Blut, M., & Rudolph, T. (2014). New insights in the moderating effect of switching costs on the satisfaction – repurchase behavior link. Journal of Retailing, 90(3), 408–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2014.04.001

  • Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460 – 469. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150499

  • Oliver, R. L., & Desarbo, W. S. (1998). Response determinants in satisfaction judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(4), 495 – 507. https://doi.org/10.1086/209131

  • Panigrahi, S. K., Azizan, N. A., & Khan, M. W. (2018). Investigating the empirical relationship between service quality, trust, satisfaction, and intention of customers purchasing life insurance products. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(1), 28 – 46. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i1/120734

  • Park, J. - W., & Hastak, M. (1994). Memory-based product judgments : Effects of involvement at encoding and retrieval. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 534 –547. https://doi.org/10.1086/209416

  • Pfeifer, P. E. (2005). The optimal ratio of acquisition and retention costs. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 13(2), 179 – 188. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jt.5740142

  • Picón, A., Castro, I., & Roldan, J. L. (2014). The relationship between satisfaction and loyalty : A mediator analysis. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 746 – 751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.038

  • Rodríguez, A., Látková, P., & Sun, Y. - Y. (2008). The relationship between leisure and life satisfaction : Application of activity and need theory. Social Indicators Research, 86(1), 163 – 175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9101-y

  • Rortveit, A. W., & Olsen, S. O. (2007). The role of consideration set size in explaining fish consumption. Appetite, 49(1), 214 – 222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2007.02.005

  • Saran, R., & Swamy, R. J. R. (2018). A research on a comparative study of some brand switching models in marketing. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(3), 17 – 32. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i3/121980

  • Schultz, T. R., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Cognitive dissonance reduction as constraint satisfaction. Psychological Review, 103(6), 219 – 240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.103.2.219

  • Seiders, K., Voss, G. B., Grewal, D., & Godfrey, A. L. (2005). Do satisfied customers buy more ? Examining moderating influences in a retailing context. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.26

  • Sharifi, S. S., & Esfidani, M. R. (2014). The impacts of relationship marketing on cognitive dissonance, satisfaction, and loyalty : The mediating role of trust and cognitive dissonance. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 42(6), 553 – 575. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-05-2013-0109

  • Strahilevitz, M., & Loewenstein, G. (1998). The effect of ownership history on the valuation of objects. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3), 276 – 289. https://doi.org/10.1086/209539

  • Voss, G. B., Godfrey, A., & Seiders, K. (2010). How complementarity and substitution alter the customer satisfaction – repurchase link. Journal of Marketing, 74(6), 111 – 127. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.6.111

  • Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 3 – 25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.71.1.3

  • Weiner, B. (2000). Attributional thoughts about consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(3), 382 – 387. https://doi.org/10.1086/317592

  • Yi, Y., & La, S. (2003). The moderating role of confidence in expectations and the asymmetric influence of disconfirmation on customer satisfaction. The Service Industries Journal, 23(5), 20–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060308565622

  • Yi, Y., & La, S. (2004). What influences the relationship between customer satisfaction and repurchase intention ? Investigating the effects of adjusted expectations and customer loyalty. Psychology and Marketing, 21(5), 351 – 373. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20009


Abstract Views: 272

PDF Views: 0




  • Why Satisfied Consumers do not Repurchase ? The Perspective of Attribution Theory on Repurchase Intention

Abstract Views: 272  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Kun Woo Yoo
Kyunghee University, 26 Kyungheedaero, Dondaemungu, Seoul, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
Sung Eun Kim
Department of Management, Yong In University, 134 Yongindaehak-ro, Cheoingu, Yonginsi, Gyeonggi-do 449-714, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of

Abstract


Satisfied consumers may switch to another brand instead of repurchase. This study focused on whether the cause of satisfaction is attributed internally or externally and how these attributions can influence the repurchase intention differently among Korean consumers. The data set of 198 respondents were collected on internal and external attribution, knowledge, switching cost, and repurchase intention. The findings indicated that internal attribution did not mediate between consumer satisfaction and repurchase intention ; whereas, external attribution mediated between consumer satisfaction and repurchase intention. Second, consumers with high knowledge had a positive influence on repurchase intention through external attribution rather than internal attribution. Lastly, satisfied consumers had a positive effect on repurchase intention for those who attributed internally only if they perceived the switching cost. The study provided strategies for satisfied consumers with their purchased products who may not necessary repurchase. Furthermore, marketers should consider developing new products with unique and new properties or functions by managing the knowledge level of consumers. This research indicated for the first time that external attribution mediates between satisfaction and repurchase intention ; whereas, internal attribution does not mediate between satisfaction and repurchase intention.

Keywords


Satisfaction, Repurchase Intention, Attribution Theory, Knowledge, Switching Cost.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom%2F2020%2Fv50%2Fi10-11%2F155839