PRIMA: Practices and Research in Marketing

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Impact of Information Processing Style on Advertising Effectiveness


Affiliations
1 Eastern Institute for Integrated Learning in Management, West Bengal, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


High advertising effectiveness has become pertinent today with escalating media costs and greater competition among marketers. This paper tests whether an advertisement can be more persuasive if its appeal aligns with the type of advertisement processing by the target audience. Specifically, it was assessed whether individuals vary in their tendency to use the two processing styles e.g. cognition and affect, to process advertisement information. Moreover, it was assessed whether the affective and cognitive processing styles are independent and yet can operate interactively. These were tested across high and low involvement products to ensure greater generalizability of the results. This research found that cognitive and affective processing may take place independently as well as interactively, though in varying extents and sequences, and advertising effectiveness is higher if its appeal matches with the processing styles of the target audience. Additionally, differences in consumers’ response to ad appeals across FMCG and durables have been established.

Keywords

Cognition, Affection, Information Processing, Advertisement Appeal, Advertising Effectiveness, Advertising Strategy.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Aaker, D. A., Douglas, M. S., & Hagerty, R. M. (1986), Warmth in advertising: Measurement, impact and sequence effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 1, 365-81.

  • Akbari, M. (2015). Different impacts of advertising appeals on advertising attitude for high and low involvement products. Global Business Review, 16(3), 478-493.

  • BoothButterfield, M., & BoothButterfield, S. (1990), Conceptualizing affect as information in communication production. Human Communication Research, 16(2), 451-476.

  • Bruke, M. C., & Edell, J. A. E. (1989). The impact of feelings on ad-based affect and cognition. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(1), 69-83.

  • Burns, A. C., & Bush, R. F. (2007). Marketing Research, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

  • Cacciopo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116-131.

  • Cacciopo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 306-307.

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Morris, K. (1983). Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 805-818.

  • Calder, B. J., Lynn, W. P., & Alice, M. T. (1981). Designing research for application. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(3), 197-207.

  • Chaoying, T., Jian, S., & Ille, F. R. (2011). Information handling styles, advertising and brand attitude: A Chinese brand case study. International Journal of China Marketing, 1(2), 45-50.

  • Cooper, R. D., & Schindler, P. S. (2006). Business research methods, (9th Ed.). New-Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill.

  • Dube, L., Chattopadhyay, A., & Letarte, A. (1996). Should advertising appeals match the basis of consumer attitudes? Journal of Advertising Research, 36(4), 82-89.

  • Edell, J., & Bruke, M. C. (1987). The power of feelings in understanding advertising effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(4), 421-423.

  • Engel, J. F., & Blackwell, R. D. (1982). Consumer behavior. New York, NY: The Dryden Press.

  • Fabrigar, L. R., & Petty, R. E. (1999). The role of the affective and cognitive bases of attitudes in susceptibility to affectively. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 363-381.

  • Field, A. (2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS for windows. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

  • Gardner, M. (1985). Mood states and consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(4), 281-300.

  • Garson, D. (2007, June). Multivariate GLM, MANOVA, and MANOVA. Retrieved on 5.6.2016 from http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/manova.htm.

  • Geuens, M., & De Pelsmacker, P. (1999). Affect intensity revisited: Individual differences and the communication effects of emotional stimuli. Psychology & Marketing, 16(3), 195-209.

  • Grande, I. (2005). Dimension in scales for measuring exploratory tendencies and stimulation levels in consumers: A cross-cultural comparison of the USA and Spain. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(5), 363-373.

  • Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Tatham, R., & Anderson, R. E. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (5th Ed.). USA: Pearson Education.

  • Hampton, G. M. (1979), Students as subjects in international behavioral studies, Journal of International Business Studies, 10(2), 94-96.

  • Haugtvedt, C. P., Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1992), Need for cognition and advertising: Understanding the role of personality variables in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1, 239-260.

  • Homer, P. M. (1990), The mediating role of attitude toward the ad: Some additional evidence. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(1), 78-86.

  • Inman, J. J., McAlister, L., & Hoyer, W. D. (1990), Promotion signal: Proxy for a price cut. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 74-81.

  • Kari, E. (1990). The interplay of affect and cognition in attitude formation and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(2), 202-216.

  • Khera, I., & Benson, J. (1970). Are students really poor substitutes for businessmen in behavioral research? Journal of Marketing Research, 7, 529-532.

  • Kline, P. (1993). A handbook of psychological testing. Routledge, London.

  • LaBarbera, P.A., Weingard, P., & Yorkston, E. A. (1998). Matching the message to the mind: advertising imagery and consumer processing styles. Journal of Advertising Research, 38(4), 29-43.

  • Lafferty, B., & Goldsmith, R. (1999). Corporate credibility’s role in consumers’ attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus a low credibility endorser is used in the ad. Journal of Business Research, 44, 109-116.

  • Larsen, R. J., & Diener, E. (1987). Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic: A review. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 1-39.

  • Lecrec, F., Schmitt, B. H., & Dube, L. (1994). Foreign branding and its effects on product perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 263-271.

  • Lin, L. (2011). The impact of advertising appeals and advertising spokespersons on advertising attitudes and purchase intentions. African Journal of Business Management, 5(21), 8446-8457.

  • MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pre-testing context. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 48-65.

  • Mantel, S. P., & Kardes, F. R. (1999). The role of direction of comparison, attribute-based processing, and attitude-based processing in consumer preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 335-352.

  • Mesdag, M. (2000). Culture sensitive adaptation or global standardization: The duration of use hypothesis. International Marketing Review, 17(1), 74-84.

  • Mishra, A. (2009). Indian Perspective about advertising appeal. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 1(2), 23-24.

  • Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1981). Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitudes? Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 318-322.

  • Mohanty, A. N., & Parida, B. B. (2014). Influence of emotional and rational product appeal on brand purchase decision. Siddhant, 14(1), 45-54.

  • Moore, D. J., Harris, W. D., & Chen, H. C. (1995). Affect intensity: An individual difference response to advertising appeals. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(3), 154-164.

  • Neuman, W. (1997). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (3rd ed.), USA: Allyn and Bacon.

  • Obermiller, C., & Spangenberg, E. R. (1996). Development of a scale to measure consumer skepticism toward advertising, Working Paper, Seattle University.

  • Peterson, R. A. (2001). On the use of college students in social science research: Insights from a second-order meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 450-461.

  • Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1986). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(3), 135-146.

  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986), Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.

  • Prendergast, G. P., Poon, D. T. Y., & Tsang, A. L. (2008), Predicting premium proneness. Journal of Advertising Research, 48(2), 287-296.

  • Punj, G., & Coulter, K. S. (1999). Influence of viewing context on the determinants of attitude toward the ad and the brand, Journal of Business Research, 45(1), 47-58.

  • Raman, N. V., Chattopadhyay, P., & Hoyer, W. D. (1995). Do consumers seek emotional situations: The need for emotion scale. Advances in Consumer Research, 22, eds.

  • Kardes, F. R., Sujan, M., & Provo, U. T. (1995). Association for Consumer Research, 537-542.

  • Ruiz, S., & Sicilia, M. (2004). The impact of cognitive and/or affective processing styles on consumer response to advertising appeals. Journal of Business Research, 57(12), 657-664.

  • Shuttleworth, M. (2008, August). Definition of Research, Retrieved on 10.01.2017 from http://www.experiment-esources.com/definition-of-research.html.

  • Sojka, J. Z., & Giese, J. L. (1997). Thinking and/or feeling: An examination of interaction between processing styles. Advances in Consumer Research, 24, 438-442.

  • Solomon, M. R. (1992). Consumer behavior. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

  • Stevens, J. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Suri, R., & Monroe, K. B. (2001), The effects of need for cognition and trait anxiety on price acceptability. Psychology of Marketing, 18(1), 21-42.

  • Yavas, U. (1994). Research note: Students as subjects in advertising and marketing, International Marketing Review, 11(4), 35-44.

  • Yi, Y. (1990). Cognitive and affective priming effects of the context for print advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 19, 40-48.

  • Zajonc, R. B., & Markus, H. (1982). Affective and cognitive factors in preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 123-131.

  • Zanna, M. P., & Rempel, J. K. (1988). Attitudes: A new look at an old concept. In D. Bar-Tal & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), The social psychology of knowledge (pp.315334), Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

  • Zhang, Y., & Buda, R. (1999). Moderating effects of need for cognition on responses to positively versus negatively framed advertising messages. Journal of Advertising, 28(2), 1-15.

  • Zhang, Y. (1996). Responses to humorous advertising: The moderating effect of need for cognition. Journal of Advertising, 25(1), 15-32.


Abstract Views: 214

PDF Views: 0




  • Impact of Information Processing Style on Advertising Effectiveness

Abstract Views: 214  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Surajit Ghosh Dastidar
Eastern Institute for Integrated Learning in Management, West Bengal, India
Kinkini Bhadra
Eastern Institute for Integrated Learning in Management, West Bengal, India

Abstract


High advertising effectiveness has become pertinent today with escalating media costs and greater competition among marketers. This paper tests whether an advertisement can be more persuasive if its appeal aligns with the type of advertisement processing by the target audience. Specifically, it was assessed whether individuals vary in their tendency to use the two processing styles e.g. cognition and affect, to process advertisement information. Moreover, it was assessed whether the affective and cognitive processing styles are independent and yet can operate interactively. These were tested across high and low involvement products to ensure greater generalizability of the results. This research found that cognitive and affective processing may take place independently as well as interactively, though in varying extents and sequences, and advertising effectiveness is higher if its appeal matches with the processing styles of the target audience. Additionally, differences in consumers’ response to ad appeals across FMCG and durables have been established.

Keywords


Cognition, Affection, Information Processing, Advertisement Appeal, Advertising Effectiveness, Advertising Strategy.

References