Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Enhancing Constructive Learning by Integrating Theory and Practice


Affiliations
1 Mechanical Engineering, KLE Technical University, Vidyanagar, Hubli, Karnataka, India
2 Production Engineering, BVB College of Engineering & Technology, Hubli, Karnataka, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Active learning and experiential learning are two sides of the same coin. One side highlights on self learning (cooperativeness) and other side learn by doing (experience). Now a day's technical education needs a new approach in student learning. This paper provides the information of teaching learning process which bridges the gap between theory and practice. It is found that many students lack in understanding the basic concept engineering, on time refreshing and regular interaction help students to understand the concepts in a better way. Integration of theory with the laboratory will cause an experiential learning for student. If course project is included, it causes active learning where students start working in teams. The main goal of this activity was to expose Pg students of Production Management in areas like Design, Fabrication, Testing and Analyzing the 'Setup' or 'Automatic Machine' prepared during the course time. Assessment is done systematically and Program outcomes (PO3, PO5 PO6 and PO10 of NBA for PG program) were addressed by the way of the task given to the students. The idea here is to generate a platform for their creative work. The students were grouped (heterogeneous group) based on their previous ranking. The project was successfully completed on time and students got good practical exposure about the components and its complexity for proper functionality. It is also quite evident that the quality of answers in the main examination (SEE) showed a remarkable improvement because of meaningful and transferable 'constructive learning'.

Keywords

Active Learning, Constructive Learning, Regular Assessment, POs (NBA).
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Washington, DC: Eric Clearing house on Higher Education.
  • Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Walker, D. (1993). Introduction: Understanding learning from experience. In D. Boud, R. Cohen & D.Walker (Eds.), Using experience for learning (pp. 117). Bristol, PA: Society for Research into Higher Education.
  • Choi, I., & Lee, K. (2008). A case-based learning environment design for real-world classroom management problem solving. Tech Trends, 52(3), 26-31.
  • Clapton, G., & Cree, V. (2004). Integration of learning for practice: Literature review. In Learning for effective and ethical practice. Edinburgh:Scottish
  • Dewey, J. (1904/1974). The relation of theory to practice in education. In R. Archambault (Ed.), John Dewey on Education: Selected Writings (pp. 315-338). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Dewey, J. (1929/1988). The quest for certainty. In J.A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works, Vol. 4: 1929 (p. 30). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Dorfman, R. A. (1996). Clinical social work: Definition, practice and vision. NewYork, NY: Brunner/Mazel.
  • Freire, Paulo. [1970] 1994. Pedagogy of the oppressed.(Original work published 1970) (Trans. Myra Bergman Ramos). New York, NY:Continuum.
  • Fiszer, E. P. (2004). How teachers learn best. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.
  • Forrester-Jones, R., & Hatzidimitriadou, E. (2006). Learning in the real world? Exploring widening participation student views concerning the 'fit' between knowledge learnt and work practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(6), 611-624.
  • Good, D.M., & Schubert, C. R. (2001). Faculty practice: How it enhances teaching. Journal of Nursing Education, 10(9). 389-396.
  • Hutchings, P. (1990, June).Assessment and the way it works: Closing plenary address, Association of Higher Education Conference on Assessment, Washington, DC.
  • Kember, D. (2000).Action learning and action research: Improving the quality of teaching & learning.London, UK:Kogan Page.
  • Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning. Engle wood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
  • Kramer, B. J. (1998). Preparing social workers for the inevitable: A preliminary investigation of a course on death, grief, and loss. Journal of Social Work Education, 34(2), 211-227.
  • Kramer, M., Polifroni, C., & Organek, N. (1986). Effects of faculty practice on students learning outcomes. Journal of Professional Nursing, 2, 289-301.

Abstract Views: 229

PDF Views: 0




  • Enhancing Constructive Learning by Integrating Theory and Practice

Abstract Views: 229  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Prasanna Raravi
Mechanical Engineering, KLE Technical University, Vidyanagar, Hubli, Karnataka, India
H. K. Madhusudan
Production Engineering, BVB College of Engineering & Technology, Hubli, Karnataka, India

Abstract


Active learning and experiential learning are two sides of the same coin. One side highlights on self learning (cooperativeness) and other side learn by doing (experience). Now a day's technical education needs a new approach in student learning. This paper provides the information of teaching learning process which bridges the gap between theory and practice. It is found that many students lack in understanding the basic concept engineering, on time refreshing and regular interaction help students to understand the concepts in a better way. Integration of theory with the laboratory will cause an experiential learning for student. If course project is included, it causes active learning where students start working in teams. The main goal of this activity was to expose Pg students of Production Management in areas like Design, Fabrication, Testing and Analyzing the 'Setup' or 'Automatic Machine' prepared during the course time. Assessment is done systematically and Program outcomes (PO3, PO5 PO6 and PO10 of NBA for PG program) were addressed by the way of the task given to the students. The idea here is to generate a platform for their creative work. The students were grouped (heterogeneous group) based on their previous ranking. The project was successfully completed on time and students got good practical exposure about the components and its complexity for proper functionality. It is also quite evident that the quality of answers in the main examination (SEE) showed a remarkable improvement because of meaningful and transferable 'constructive learning'.

Keywords


Active Learning, Constructive Learning, Regular Assessment, POs (NBA).

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet%2F2017%2Fv30i3%2F110611