Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Desired Educational Ecosystem in the Fast-Growing Educational Institutes in India


Affiliations
1 Adjunct Professor and Former HOD, Center for International Affairs, National Institute of Technical Teachers Training and Research, Chennai, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In the 21st century, the Indian economy has to grow faster than its rivals. It depends on the production of knowledge and human capitals by the state technical universities, autonomous institutes, and deemed universities. Hence, the high- performing engineering faculty members have to be assisted and supported by an appropriate academic ecosystem as other global research universities perfected by them. Well- developed engineering universities in China, Japan, Korea and Singapore have introduced many administrative processes to support their key performing faculties to reach excellence and global leadership. This demands most appropriate and continuously supporting academic system too. A snap study has been undertaken to identify the most desirable academic ecosystem in the well-performing engineering institutes in the southern states of India. 131 Senior Faculty members at Assistant, Associate, and Professors' cadre have been selected to form a Quality Circle to identify the desired academic ecosystem. These participants attended the workshops on Higher Education Administration, Leadership Development and Institutional Development. The significant outcomes are as follows: 1. Unbiased Faculty Recruitment System which focuses on the Excellence, 2. Skill Focused Induction and In-House Training Processes, 3. Cognitive and Higher Order Training and Development Processes as per Emerging Needs, 4. Appreciative Performance Inquiry, 5. Counselling, Coaching and Mentoring the Emerging High Performers, 6. Digital-based Instructional Packages Production Center, 7. Sabbatical Leave to Undergo Faculty Development Programs to meet the Emerging needs under IDAs, 8. Implementation of Appropriate Reward System like new pay scales as approved by AICTE, 9. Sanction of Funds to Participate in the International Conferences as per the Rules, Norms, and Standards, and 10. Approval for accepting the International Invitations to participate in the Conferences and Summits without any grants. All these would enhance the academic ecosystem.

Keywords

Academic Ecosystem, Fast-growing Educational Institutes, Planning Conducive Ecosystem.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Anne M. Casey (2012) Does Tenure Matter? Factors Influencing Faculty Contribution to Institutional Repositories, Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, V.1 I.1, 1/(1)ep1032.http://dx.doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1032
  • Department of Psychology. Criteria for Faculty Evaluation, Promotion and Tenure, New Mexico State University
  • Jean Waltman and Carol Hollenhead (2005) Creating a positive Departmental Climate: Principles for Best Practices, University of Michigan ,http://www.umich.edu/advproj/principles.pdf
  • Jihyun Kim (2006) Motivating and Impeding Factors Affecting Faculty Contribution to Institutional Repositories, Digital Libraries-collection, dissemination, user issues.
  • Faculty Retention Tool kit www.engr.washington.edu/advances/Retention
  • Maine Business School (1998) Faculty Evaluation Standards, University of Maine
  • Oregon State University (2011) Faculty Handbook: Promotion and Tenure Guidelines, http://oregonstate.edu/admin/aa/faculty-handbook-promotion-and-tenure
  • Robert H. Davis et al. (2001) Faculty Recruitment and Retention, University of Colorado at Boulder: Task Force Report
  • Sampson, J.P., Jr. (2007) Guidelines for Evaluation of Service in Faculty Performance Review, College of Education, Florida State University.
  • Walter H. Gmelch (2006) Stress Management Strategies for Academic Leaders, Effective Practices for Academic Leaders . http://www.engr.washington.edu/lead/2007BlinderMaterials.htm#worklifew
  • Women in Science and Engineering, Leadership Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, http://wisell.engr.wise.edu/initiatives/Recommendations.rtf
  • Short CV of the Author: Thanikachalam Vedhathiri B.E (Civil Engineering, 1968, University of Madras), M.Tech ( Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 1970, IIT-Madras), PhD (Filter Design, 1975, University of Madras), M.S ( Instructional System Technology, 1988, Indiana University, USA.), FIE., FIGS., FFIUCIEE, FMR Fulbright Senior Research Scholar . Guided 18 PhDs in Engineering Education.

Abstract Views: 314

PDF Views: 5




  • Desired Educational Ecosystem in the Fast-Growing Educational Institutes in India

Abstract Views: 314  |  PDF Views: 5

Authors

Thanikachalam Vedhathiri
Adjunct Professor and Former HOD, Center for International Affairs, National Institute of Technical Teachers Training and Research, Chennai, India

Abstract


In the 21st century, the Indian economy has to grow faster than its rivals. It depends on the production of knowledge and human capitals by the state technical universities, autonomous institutes, and deemed universities. Hence, the high- performing engineering faculty members have to be assisted and supported by an appropriate academic ecosystem as other global research universities perfected by them. Well- developed engineering universities in China, Japan, Korea and Singapore have introduced many administrative processes to support their key performing faculties to reach excellence and global leadership. This demands most appropriate and continuously supporting academic system too. A snap study has been undertaken to identify the most desirable academic ecosystem in the well-performing engineering institutes in the southern states of India. 131 Senior Faculty members at Assistant, Associate, and Professors' cadre have been selected to form a Quality Circle to identify the desired academic ecosystem. These participants attended the workshops on Higher Education Administration, Leadership Development and Institutional Development. The significant outcomes are as follows: 1. Unbiased Faculty Recruitment System which focuses on the Excellence, 2. Skill Focused Induction and In-House Training Processes, 3. Cognitive and Higher Order Training and Development Processes as per Emerging Needs, 4. Appreciative Performance Inquiry, 5. Counselling, Coaching and Mentoring the Emerging High Performers, 6. Digital-based Instructional Packages Production Center, 7. Sabbatical Leave to Undergo Faculty Development Programs to meet the Emerging needs under IDAs, 8. Implementation of Appropriate Reward System like new pay scales as approved by AICTE, 9. Sanction of Funds to Participate in the International Conferences as per the Rules, Norms, and Standards, and 10. Approval for accepting the International Invitations to participate in the Conferences and Summits without any grants. All these would enhance the academic ecosystem.

Keywords


Academic Ecosystem, Fast-growing Educational Institutes, Planning Conducive Ecosystem.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet%2F2019%2Fv32i4%2F145513