Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Assessment of Course Outcomes Attainment using Confidence Limits


     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Course Outcomes (CO) assessment is one of the most important components of Outcome Based Education (OBE) to describe the specific type and level of learning students. The programs must have an effective end results in every course and their systematic assessment with proper documentation and should evaluate continuously to establish certain standards leading to program accreditation. In the calculation of CO attainment, the mean values are usually considered as a target values but it may create ambiguity in decision making. The target value in conventional method is unbounded on the upper and lower ends, which undermines interpretations of student's category associated with their performance. In this paper an attempt has been made with a new approach for calculation of CO attainments based on Lower Confidence Limit (LCL) and Upper Confidence Limit (UCL) and compared against conventional method. This comparison has shown that the proposed method showed a nontrivial improvement over existing conventional method and found more flexible, relatively well behaved, and applicable to a wide range of students' categories. Further, proposed method has the advantage of being useful in framing appropriate syllabi of courses and in making effective strategy to improve students' Performance.

Keywords

Outcome Based Education, Lower Confidence Limit, Upper Confidence Limit, Attainment of Course Outcome.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Rajak, Akash, Shrivastava, Ajay Kumar and Shrivastava, Divya Prakash. (2018) Automating Outcome Based Education for the Attainment of Course and Program Outcomes,The Fifth HCT Information Technology Trends (ITT 2018), Dubai, UAE, 373-376.
  • Roy,Amit Kumar, Varshney,Gunjan and Chandna,V., K. (2015) Learning through modern tools in power quality to evaluate course outcome, MOOCs Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE) 2015 IEEE 3rd International Conference on, 96-99.
  • Hakan, Gurocak. (2008) Direct Measures For Course Outcomes Assessment For ABET Accreditation. Paper read at American Society Engineering Education, 22 - 25 June 2008, at Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Turkmen,N.,Khaled, A., R., A.,al-Raghbi, O., M., Zaki, G., Siddique,M., Gari,A., and Bokhary, A. (2010) A Procedure to Assess Engineering Courses based on Program Outcomes. Retrieved October 15, 2010 from http://ipac.kacst.edu.sa/eDoc/2007/168457_1.pdf.
  • Biney,O., Paul, and Milton, Bryant, R. (2010) A Novel Strategy for the Direct Assessment and Improvement of Engineering Programs Developed and Implemented by Prairie View A&M University. Retrieved October 15, 2010 from http://engg.kau.edu.sa/AAU/AssExample.pdf.
  • Terang, Parveen, P., Terang, Kr, Sanjiba. Bisoyi, Chandna, Vinay Kumar. (2015) Weightage factor analysis between programme Outcomes and course Outcomes: A case study, MOOCs Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE) 2015 IEEE 3rd International Conference on, 84-87.
  • Memon, Q., A., and Harb, A. (2009) Developing Electrical Engineering Education Program Assessment Process at UAE University. Australian Journal of Engineering Education, 15 (3):10.
  • 8.Ramchandra, S., Maitra, S, Mallikarjuna Babu, K. (2014) Method for estimation of attainment of program outcome through course outcome for outcome based education, 2014 IEEE International Conference on MOOC, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE), 7 – 12.
  • Shaeiwitz, Joseph, and Daina, Briedis. (2007) Direct Assessment Measures. Paper read at American Society of Engineering Education, 24 - 27 June, Honolulu, Hawaii.
  • Shallu Bassi, V.,Chandna, K., and Sangeeta Singh. (2015) Analysis of course outcomes of HVE-a tool for assessment of programme outcomes, MOOCs Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE), 2015 IEEE 3rd International Conference on, 35-37.
  • Snedecor, G., W., and Cochran,W., G. 1989 Statistical methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.
  • Chandna, Vinay Kumar. (2015) Course outcome assessment and improvement on weak student, MOOCs Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE) 2015 IEEE 3rdInternational Conference on, 38-40.
  • Washington Accord, [online] Available: www.ieagreements.org/accords.
  • Everitt, B. S. and Skrondal, A. (2010), The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics, Cambridge University Press, ISBN-13 : 978-0521766999, 4th edition (August 1, 2010).
  • Kulkarni, Pravin G. and Barot, Ami R. (2019) Methodology for Course Outcomes Attainment Analysis for An Engineering Course, International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(03), 16-19.
  • Rajak, Akash, Shrivastava, Ajay Kumar and Shrivastava, Divya Prakash (2019) Course Outcome Attainments in OBE for Weak Students, International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), 8(11), 506-509.
  • Balasubramani, R., and Chiplunkar, Niranjan N. (2017) Attainment of Programme Outcomes Through Course Outcomes In Outcome Based Education: A Case Study, Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 31(02), pp. 26-30.
  • Premalatha K., Course and Program Outcomes Assessment Methods in Outcome-Based Education: A Review (2019) Attainment of Programme Outcomes Through Course Outcomes In Outcome Based Education: A Case Study, Journal of Education, 199(3):111-127. doi:10.1177/0022057419854351

Abstract Views: 172

PDF Views: 1




  • Assessment of Course Outcomes Attainment using Confidence Limits

Abstract Views: 172  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Abstract


Course Outcomes (CO) assessment is one of the most important components of Outcome Based Education (OBE) to describe the specific type and level of learning students. The programs must have an effective end results in every course and their systematic assessment with proper documentation and should evaluate continuously to establish certain standards leading to program accreditation. In the calculation of CO attainment, the mean values are usually considered as a target values but it may create ambiguity in decision making. The target value in conventional method is unbounded on the upper and lower ends, which undermines interpretations of student's category associated with their performance. In this paper an attempt has been made with a new approach for calculation of CO attainments based on Lower Confidence Limit (LCL) and Upper Confidence Limit (UCL) and compared against conventional method. This comparison has shown that the proposed method showed a nontrivial improvement over existing conventional method and found more flexible, relatively well behaved, and applicable to a wide range of students' categories. Further, proposed method has the advantage of being useful in framing appropriate syllabi of courses and in making effective strategy to improve students' Performance.

Keywords


Outcome Based Education, Lower Confidence Limit, Upper Confidence Limit, Attainment of Course Outcome.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet%2F2022%2Fv35i3%2F22084