Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Developing Synchronous and Asynchronous Online Learning Models for Engineering College Students in India : A Grounded Theory Approach


Affiliations
1 Symbiosis Institute of Management Studies, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The Covid 19 pandemic lockdown in India led the education to move from classroom learning to online learning. This created the need for online learning pedagogies. The current study focuses on developing synchronous and asynchronous models of online learning for engineering students. The data for the current study was collected through interviews of engineering students of different specializations. Transcription of interviews were prepared and subjected to three levels of coding i.e. open coding, axial coding and selective coding in order to prepare concepts. The concepts were then integrated into a model using grounded theory approach. The finding indicate that synchronous mode leads to group learning, peer learning, learning through simulation and effective learning. The asynchronous mode leads to reinforcement based learning.

Keywords

Online Learning, Engineering, India, Synchronous, Asynchronous.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Al-Emran, M., Elsherif, H. M., & Shaalan, K. (2016). Investigating attitudes towards the use of mobile learning in higher education. Computers in Human behavior, 56, 93-102.
  • Bourdeaux, R., & Schoenack, L. (2016). Adult student expectations and experiences in an online learning environment. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 64(3), 152-161.
  • Brannen, J. (Ed.). (2017). Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research. Routledge.
  • Buttar, S. S. (2016). ICT in higher education. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1).
  • Chadha, A. (2018). Virtual classrooms: Analyzing student and instructor collaborative experiences. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 18(3).
  • Charmaz, K. (2020). “With constructivist grounded theory you can't hide”: Social justice research and critical inquiry in the public sphere. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(2), 165-176.
  • Chatterjee, S. (2020). The COVID-19 Pandemic Through the Lens of a Medical Student in India. International Journal of Medical Students, 8(1), 82-83.
  • Chatterjee, S. (2020). The COVID-19 Pandemic Through the Lens of a Medical Student in India. International Journal of Medical Students, 8(1), 82-83.
  • Chen, N. S., Ko, H. C., Kinshuk, & Lin, T. (2005). A model for synchronous learning using the Internet. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(2), 181-194.
  • Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative sociology, 13(1), 3-21.
  • Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., & Glowatz, M. (2020). COVID-19: 20 Countries' Higher Education Intra-Period Digital Pedagogy Responses. Journal of Applied Teaching and Learning (JALT), 3(1).
  • Dahlstrom-Hakki, I., Alstad, Z., & Banerjee, M. (2020). Comparing synchronous and asynchronous online discussions for students with disabilities: the impact of social presence. Computers & Education, 150, 103842.
  • De Guzman, M. J. J. (2020). Business Administration Students' Skills and Capability on Synchronous and Asynchronous Alternative Delivery of Learning. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 3(1), 28-34.
  • Dey, P., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2019). Blended learning to improve quality of primary education among underprivileged school children in India. Education and Information Technologies, 24(3), 1995-2016.
  • Fields, A. J., & Hartnett, M. (2020). Online teaching and learning: COVID-19 Special Issue. Journal of Open Flexible and Distance Learning, 24(1), 2.
  • Ghosh, A., Gupta, R., & Misra, A. (2020). Telemedicine for diabetes care in India during COVID19 pandemic and national lockdown period: guidelines for physicians. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews.
  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory Strategies for Qualitative Research. Mill Valley, CA Sociology Press.
  • Gupta, V., & Jain, N. (2017). Harnessing information and communication technologies for effective knowledge creation. Journal of Enterprise Information Management.
  • Hammond, M. (2005). A review of recent papers on online discussion in teaching and learning in higher education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 9-23.
  • Hampel, R. (2006). Rethinking task design for the digital age: A framework for language teaching and learning in asynchronous online nvironment. ReCALL, 18(1), 105-121.
  • Holton, G. J. (1988). Thematic origins of scientific thought: Kepler to Einstein. Harvard University Press.
  • Jena, A. K. (2019). Effects of asynchronous e-mail intervention on learning performance in relation to thinking skills, executive functions and attention benefits of Indian children. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 7(3), 151-168.
  • Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
  • Jung, Y., & Lee, J. (2018). Learning engagement and persistence in massive open online courses (MOOCS). Computers & Education, 122, 9-22.
  • Lee, J., Lim, C., & Kim, H. (2017). Development of an instructional design model for flipped learning in higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(2), 427-453.
  • Lim, F. P. (2017). An analysis of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools in e-learning. Advanced Science and Technology Letters, 143(46), 230-234.
  • Marjanovic, O. (1999). Learning and teaching in a synchronous collaborative environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15(2), 129-138.
  • Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205-222.
  • Mathews, E., Chittuparamban, B. A., Joshi, S., & Dey, P. (2013). Engaging the Corporate Sector: Narayana Murthy Committee Recommendations on Higher Education. Economic and Political Weekly, 41-47.
  • Mayende, G., Prinz, A., Isabwe, G. M. N., & Muyinda, P. B. (2016, September). Learning groups for MOOCs lessons for online learning in higher education. In International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (pp. 185-198). Springer, Cham.
  • Mishra, S. (2009). E-learning in India. International Journal on E-Learning, 8(4), 549-560.
  • Mnih, V., Badia, A. P., Mirza, M., Graves, A., Lillicrap, T., Harley, T., ... & Kavukcuoglu, K. (2016, June). Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning. In International conference on machine learning (pp. 1928-1937).
  • Nieuwoudt, J. E. (2020). Investigating synchronous and asynchronous class attendance as predictors of academic success in online education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 15-25.
  • Parahoo, S. K., Santally, M. I., Rajabalee, Y., & Harvey, H. L. (2016). Designing a predictive model of student satisfaction in online learning. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 26(1), 1-19.
  • Passonneau, S., & Coffey, D. (2011). The role of synchronous virtual reference in teaching and learning: A grounded theory analysis of instant messaging transcripts. College & Research Libraries, 72(3), 276-295.
  • Pattnayak, J., & Pattnaik, S. (2020). Digital Learning: The Booster for Smart India. In New Paradigm in Decision Science and Management (pp. 387-397). Springer, Singapore.
  • Ragusa, A. T. (2017). Technologically-mediated communication: student expectations and experiences in a FOMO society. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 39.
  • Rao, P. (2011). E‐learning in India: the role of national culture and strategic implications. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal.
  • Rosenberg, J., Akcaoglu, M., Willet, K. B. S., Greenhalgh, S., & Koehler, M. (2017, March). A tale of two Twitters: Synchronous and asynchronous use of the same hashtag. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 283-286). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  • Rovai, A. P. (2002). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 319-332.
  • Shi, L., Fan, L., Xiao, H., Chen, Z., Tong, X., Liu, M., & Cao, D. (2019). Constructing a general competency model for Chinese public health physicians: a qualitative and quantitative study. European journal of public health, 29(6), 1184-1191.
  • Subhash, S., & Cudney, E. A. (2018). Gamified learning in higher education: A systematic review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 192-206.
  • Zheng, Y. Y., Ma, Y. T., Zhang, J. Y., & Xie, X. (2020). COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 17(5), 259-260.

Abstract Views: 105

PDF Views: 1




  • Developing Synchronous and Asynchronous Online Learning Models for Engineering College Students in India : A Grounded Theory Approach

Abstract Views: 105  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Chopra Komal
Symbiosis Institute of Management Studies, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India
Jaya Chitranshi
Symbiosis Institute of Management Studies, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India

Abstract


The Covid 19 pandemic lockdown in India led the education to move from classroom learning to online learning. This created the need for online learning pedagogies. The current study focuses on developing synchronous and asynchronous models of online learning for engineering students. The data for the current study was collected through interviews of engineering students of different specializations. Transcription of interviews were prepared and subjected to three levels of coding i.e. open coding, axial coding and selective coding in order to prepare concepts. The concepts were then integrated into a model using grounded theory approach. The finding indicate that synchronous mode leads to group learning, peer learning, learning through simulation and effective learning. The asynchronous mode leads to reinforcement based learning.

Keywords


Online Learning, Engineering, India, Synchronous, Asynchronous.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet%2F2022%2Fv35i3%2F22089