Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Qualitative Analysis of Psychological Framework of Online Classes during Covid-19 Using NVIVO


Affiliations
1 School of Advanced Sciences and Languages, VIT Bhopal University, Kothari Kalan, Bhopal-Indore Highway Sehore Dt., Madhya Pradesh - 466114, India
2 Amity School of Communication, Amity University, Gwalior, India
3 Schools of Advanced Sciences and Languages, VIT Bhopal University, Bhopal, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The purpose of this paper is to present the results of a study on whether or not online teaching-learning is a viable option for ensuring the quality of education in the future. The pandemic situation has brought major challenges to the educational institutions and institutions have to ensure that learning continues uninterrupted through virtual platforms using current technologies and tools. The theoretical framework for the survey is derived from secondary sources such as research papers, newspaper articles, and magazine articles on the topic. ProQuest and EBSCO were used for this. The study combines exploratory and descriptive methods. The paper shows that the future of the online education is not sustainable; it is just a situational arrangement and soon will be replaced by the old, traditional offline pattern, if the situation allows.

Keywords

Attitude, Attitude toward Online Education, E-Learning Platform, Higher Education, Education Policy.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Aaditya, B., & Rahul, T. M. (2021). Psychological impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on the mode choice behaviour: A hybrid choice modelling approach. Transport Policy, 08 (April), pp-47–58 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.05.003

  • Aagaard, E. M., & Earnest, M. (2021). Educational leadership in the time of a pandemic: Lessons from two institutions. In FASEB BioAdvances (Vol. 3, Issue 3, pp-182–188). https://doi.org/10.1096/fba.2020-00113

  • Ab Ghani, S. M., Abdul Hamid, N. F., & Lim, T. W. (2021). Comparison between conventional teaching and blended learning in preclinical fixed prosthodontic training: A cross-sectional study. European Journal of Dental Education, June, pp-1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12712

  • Abaci, S., Robertson, J., Linklater, H., & McNeill, F. (2021). Supporting School Tteachers’ Rapid Engagement with Online Education, Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), pp-29–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09839-5

  • Abas, I. M. Y., Alejail, I. I. E. M., & Ali, S. M. (2021). Anxiety among the Sudanese university students during the initial stage of COVID-19 p and emic. Heliyon, Vol. 7 Issue 3, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06300

  • Abazid, H., Basheti, I. A., Al-Jomaa, E. E., Abazid, A., & Kloub, W. M. (2021). Public knowledge, beliefs, psychological responses, and behavioural changes during the outbreak of COVID-19 in the middle east, Pharmacy Practice (Vol. 19, Issue2). https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2021.2.23 06

  • Abbas, A. H. (2020). Politicizing the Pandemic: A Schemata Analysis of COVID-19 News in Two Selected Newspapers. In International Journal for the Semiotics of Law. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09745-2

  • Abbas, A., Samad, L., Ozgediz, D., Ademuyiwa, A., Ameh, E. A., Banu, T., Botelho, F., Espineda, B., Gathuya, Z., Lakhoo, K., Olubunmi, L. A., Madhuri, V., Millano, L., Nabulindo, S., Shehata, S., Wong, K., & Butler, M. W. (2021). Online action planning forums to develop a roadmap to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on the delivery of global children’s surgical care. Pediatric Surgery International (Vol. 37, Issue 9, pp. 1221–1233). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-021-04903-4

  • Agustina, E., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2017). Perceptions of Indonesian Teachers and Students on the Use of Quipper School as an Online Platform for Extended EFL Learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8 (4), 794. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0804.20

  • Asgari, S., Trajkovic, J., Rahmani, M., Zhang, W., Lo, R. C., & Sciortino, A. (2021). An observational study of engineering online education during the COVID-19 pandemic. In PLoS ONE (Vol. 16, Issue 4 April). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250041

  • Barnard, L., Paton, V., & Lan, W. (2008). Mediator in the Relationship between Online Course Perceptions with Achievement. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Vol. 9 Issue 2, pp-1–11.

  • Bellini, M. I., Pengel, L., Potena, L., & Segantini, L. (2021). COVID-19 and education: restructuring after the pandemic. In Transplant International (Vol. 34, Issue 2, pp-220–223). https://doi.org/10.1111/tri.13788

  • Bennett, S., & Lockyer, L. (2004). Becoming an Online Teacher: Adapting to a Changed Environment for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Educational Media International, Vol. 41 Issue 3, pp-231–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980410001680842

  • Bojović, Ž., Bojović, P. D., Vujošević, D., & Šuh, J. (2020). Education in times of crisis: Rapid transition to distance learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, Vol. 28 Issue 6, pp-1467–1489. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22318

  • Bovermann, K., Weidlich, J., & Bastiaens, T. (2018). Online learning readiness and attitudes towards gaming in gamified online learning – a mixed methods case study. In International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (Vol. 15, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0107-0

  • Chen, B., Fan, Y., Zhang, G., & Wang, Q. (2017). Examining motivations and selfregulated learning strategies of returning MOOCs learners, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp-542–543. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3029448

  • Coman, C., Țîru, L. G., Meseșan-Schmitz, L., Stanciu, C., & Bularca, M. C. (2020). Online teaching and learning in higher education during the coronavirus pandemic: Students’ perspective. In Sustainability (Switzerland) ( Vol. 12, Issue 24, pp. 1–22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410367

  • Cook, C. W., & Sonnenberg, C. (2014). Ej1073243. 7(3), 171–188.

  • Cragg, C. E. (Betty), Dunning, J., & Ellis, J. (2008). Teacher and Student Behaviors in Face-to-Face and On-LinenCourses: Dealing with Complex Concepts. Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 115–128.

  • Diana W. Sanders & Alison I. Morrison-Shetlar (2001) Student Attitudes toward Web-Enhanced Instruction in an Introductory Biology Course, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33:3, 251-262, DOI : 10.1080/08886504.2001.10782313

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry, Vol. 11 Issue 4, pp-227-268.

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, Vol. 19Issue 2, pp-109–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6

  • Dhawan, S. (2020). Online Learning: APanacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis. In Journal of Educational Technology Systems (Vol. 49, Issue 1, pp. 5–22). https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018

  • Floyd, D. L. (2003). Distance learning in community colleges: Leadership challenges for change and development, Community College Journal of Research and Practice, Vol. 27 Issue 4, pp-337–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/713838144

  • Furnes, M., Kvaal, K. S., & Høye, S. (2018). Communication in mental health nursing - Bachelor Students’ appraisal of a blended learning training programme - An exploratory study, BMC Nursing, Vol. 17 Issue 1, pp-1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-018-0288-9

  • Garg, S. B., & Garg, J. (2018). Analytical Study and Performance Comparison of Various Machine Learning Tools. Research Cell: An International Journal of Engineering Sciences, 28(63019), 2320–0332.

  • Gon, Sonia & Rawekar, Alka. (2017). Effectivity of E-Learning through Whatsapp as a Teaching Learning Tool. MVP Journal of Medical Sciences. 4.19. 10.18311/mvpjms/0/v0/i0/8454.

  • Guo, Z., Xiao, L., Van Toorn, C., Lai, Y., & Seo, C. (2016). Promoting online learners’ continuance intention: An integrated flow framework. In Information and Management (Vol. 53, Issue 2, pp. 279–295). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.10.010

  • Guo, Y., Liu, Y., Oerlemans, A., Lao, S., Wu, S., & Lew, M. S. (2016). Deep learning for visual understanding: A review. Neurocomputing, 187, 27-48.

  • Guo, Y., Liu, Y., Oerlemans, A., Lao, S., Wu, S., & Lew, M. S. (2016). Deep learning for visual understanding: A review. Neurocomputing, 187, 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUCOM.2015.09.116

  • Hollweck, T., & Doucet, A. (2020). Pracademics in the pandemic:pedagogies and professionalism, Journal of Professional Capital and Community, Vol. 5 Issue (3–4), pp-295–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-06-2020-0038

  • Holzweiss, P. C., Joyner, S. A., Fuller, M. B., Henderson, S., & Young, R. (2014). Online graduate students’ perceptions of best learning experiences. Distance Education, Vol. 35 Issue 3, pp-311–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.955262

  • Huang, L., Zhang, J., & Liu, Y. (2017). Antecedents of student MOOC revisit intention: Moderation effect of course difficulty, Int e rna tiona l Journa l of Informa tion Management, Vol. 37 Issue 2, pp-84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.12.002

  • Janse van Rensburg, E. S. (2018). Effective online teaching and learning practices for undergraduate health sciences students: An integrative review, In International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences, (Vol. 9, pp. 73–80). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2018.08.004

  • Jean-F. Tomb, White, O., Kerlavage, A. R., Clayton, R. A., Sutton, G. G., Fleischmann, R. D., Ketchum, K. A., Klenk, H. P., Gill, S., Dougherty, B. A., Nelson, K., Quackenbush, J., Zhou, L., Kirkness, E. F., Peterson, S., Loftus, B., Richardson, D., Dodson, R., Khalak, H. G., … Venter, J. C. (1997). Enhanced Reader.pdf. In Nature (Vol. 388, pp. 539–547).

  • Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, Vol. 21, Issue 3, pp-48-59

  • Liaw, S. S., Huang, H. M., & Chen, G. D. (2007). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Computers & education, Vol. 49, Issue 4, pp-1066-1080.

  • Kapilan, N., Vidhya, P., & Gao, X. Z. (2021). Virtual Laboratory: A Boon to the Mechanical Engineering Education During Covid-19 Pandemic. In Higher Education for the Future ( V ol. 8, Issue 1, pp. 31–46). https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120970757

  • Khan, M. A., Vivek, Nabi, M. K., Khojah, M., & Tahir, M. (2021). Students’ perception towards e-learning during covid-19 pandemic in India: An empirical study. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 13, Issue 1, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010057

  • Makrakis, V., & Kostoulas-Makrakis, N. (2021). Responsibility and Co-Responsibility in Light of COVID-19 and Education for Sustainability through an Aristotelian Lens. In Sustainability and climate change (Vol. 14, Issue 3, pp-158–165). https://doi.org/10.1089/scc.2020.0075

  • Martinez, P. J., Aguilar, F. J., & Ortiz, M. (2020). Transitioning from Face-to-Face to Blended and Full Online Learning Engineering Master’s Program. IEEE Transactions on Education, 63 (1), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2019.2925320

  • McGee, P., & Reis, A. (2012). Blended course design: A synthesis of best practices, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, Vol. 16 Issue 4, pp- 7–22. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.V6i4.239

  • Merisotis, J. P., & Phipps, R. A. (2010). Change : The Magazine of Higher Learning What ’s the Difference ?: Outcomes of Distance vs . Traditional Classroom-Based Learning. April 2013, pp-37–41.

  • Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1(August), 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012

  • Mohammadi, H. (2015). Investigating users’ perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model. Computers in human behavior, Vol. 45, Issue 4, pp 359-374.

  • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.044

  • Negash, S., & Wilcox, M. V. (2015). Hybrid Learning : Balancing Face-To-Face and Online Class HYbrid LEarning : BAlancing FAce-To-FAce and. January, pp-178–182.

  • Ożadowicz, A. (2020). Modified blended learning in engineering higher education during the COVID-19 lockdown-building automation courses case study. In Education Sciences (Vol. 10, Issue 10, pp.1–20). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10100292

  • Pelmin, M. (2020). Readings on Coronavirus Disease

  • (COVID-19) and the Higher Education Institution (HEIs) Emergency Preparedness in the Philippines, SSRN Electronic Journal, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3573896

  • Petrides, L. A. (2002). Web-based technologies for distributed (or distance) learning : Creating Learning-Centered Educational Experiences in the Higher Education Classroom, International Journal, Vol. 29, Issue 1, pp- 69–77.

  • Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A Literature Review on Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Teaching and Learning. In Higher Education for the Future (Vol. 8, Issue 1, pp. 133–141). https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120983481

  • Ray, S., & Srivastava, S. (2020). Virtualization of science education: a lesson from the COVID-19 pandemic. In Journal of Proteins and Proteomics (Vol. 11, Issue 2, pp. 77–80). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42485-020-00038-7

  • Roy, D., Tripathy, S., Kar, S. K., Sharma, N., Verma, S. K., & Kaushal, V. (2020). Study of knowledge, attitude, anxiety & perceived mental healthcare need in Indian population during COVID-19 pandemic. In Asian Journal of Psychiatry (Vol. 51). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102083

  • Garg, Tanya & Goyal, Ruchi. (2021). Evolution of Education System and Techniques: A Comparative Study. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Information Management and Machine Intelligence.

  • DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-9689-6_82

  • Saha, T., Das, P. P., & Singh, R. (2021). Challenges in higher education during and after COVID-19 pandemic in India, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1797(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1797/1/012065

  • Samir Abou El-Seoud, M., Taj-Eddin, I. A. T. F., Seddiek, N., El-Khouly, M. M., & Nosseir, A. (2014). E-learning and students’ motivation: A research study on the effect of e-learning on higher education, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, Vol. 9, Issue 4, pp-20–26. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v9i4.3465

  • Sanders, D. W., & Morrison-Shetlar, A. I. (2001). Student attitudes toward web-enhanced instruction in an introductory biology course, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, Vol. 33 Issue 3, pp-251–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.2001.10782 313

  • Schoonenboom, Judith & Johnson, R. & Fröhlich, Dominik. (2018). Combining Multiple Purposes of Mixing Within a Mixed Methods Research Design, International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches. 10. 271-282. 10.29034/ijmra.v10n1a17.

  • Slusser, S. R., & Erickson, R. J. (2006). Group Quizzes: An Extension of the Collaborative Learning Process, Teaching Sociology, Vol. 34 Issue 3, pp-249–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X0603400304

  • Spielman, A. I., & Sunavala-Dossabhoy, G. (2021). Pandemics and education: A historical review. Journal of Dental Education, Vol. 85 Issue 6, pp-741–746. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12615

  • Taylor, W.R. (2002). Pros and cons of online learning – a faculty perspective. Journal of European Industrial Training, 26(1), 24-37.

  • Tibola Da Rocha, V., Fritzen, B., Brandli, L. L., Da Rocha, V. T., Fritzen, • B, & Brandli, L. L. (n.d.). COVID-19 and Education for Sustainable Development Role: An Assessment of Latin American Schools. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69284-1_20

  • Treve, M. (2021). What COVID-19 has introduced into education: Challenges Facing Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), In Higher Education Pedagogies (Vol. 6, Issue 1, pp. 212–227). https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696. 2021.1951616


Abstract Views: 168

PDF Views: 0




  • Qualitative Analysis of Psychological Framework of Online Classes during Covid-19 Using NVIVO

Abstract Views: 168  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Bhatt V
School of Advanced Sciences and Languages, VIT Bhopal University, Kothari Kalan, Bhopal-Indore Highway Sehore Dt., Madhya Pradesh - 466114, India
Narula S
Amity School of Communication, Amity University, Gwalior, India
Gupta DB
Schools of Advanced Sciences and Languages, VIT Bhopal University, Bhopal, India
Sharma S
Amity School of Communication, Amity University, Gwalior, India
Sabharwal D
Amity School of Communication, Amity University, Gwalior, India

Abstract


The purpose of this paper is to present the results of a study on whether or not online teaching-learning is a viable option for ensuring the quality of education in the future. The pandemic situation has brought major challenges to the educational institutions and institutions have to ensure that learning continues uninterrupted through virtual platforms using current technologies and tools. The theoretical framework for the survey is derived from secondary sources such as research papers, newspaper articles, and magazine articles on the topic. ProQuest and EBSCO were used for this. The study combines exploratory and descriptive methods. The paper shows that the future of the online education is not sustainable; it is just a situational arrangement and soon will be replaced by the old, traditional offline pattern, if the situation allows.

Keywords


Attitude, Attitude toward Online Education, E-Learning Platform, Higher Education, Education Policy.

References