Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Learner Autonomy in Team-Based Learning : A Case Study of Mechanical Engineering Education


Affiliations
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Tainan, Taiwan, Province of China
2 Department of Economics, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Team-based learning (TBL) has been increasingly applied in engineering and science education over the past decade. This study explores a particular TBL approach used in a mechanical engineering module for second-year undergraduates in Taiwan. The results of a survey on these students’ learner autonomy (LA), perceptions of TBL, engagement with TBL, self-reported contributions and concerns about TBL activities were analyzed along with their academic performance. The results suggested that LA played a crucial role in TBL, especially contribution to group work, and that classroom implementations should therefore make it a priority to boost LA. In addition, positive reciprocity was found to be operating during group work. Group differences were found in issues the students expressed concern about. Students who cared about fairness had higher LA and were more likely to contribute to team tasks whilst some students could have been less engaged in group activities due to poor organizational structure. Several challenges were also observed in this study. They included passive learners, classroom-management problems, free-riding, and limited resources. Based on our findings, we recommend that engineering instructors encourage student-teacher communication by using bonus-point incentives, student experts, peer evaluation and group competitions.

Keywords

Learner Autonomy, Team-Based Learning, Mechanical Engineering Education, Taiwan.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Al-Neklawy, A. F., & Ismail, A. S. A. (2022). Online anatomy team-based learning using blackboard collaborate platform during COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical Anatomy, 35(1), 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23797

  • Anas, S., Kyrou, I., Rand-Weaver, M., & Karteris, E. (2022). The effect of online and in-person team- based learning (TBL) on undergraduate endocrinology teaching during COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Medical Education, 22 (1), 120. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03173-5

  • Aurachman, R. (2020). Transportation mathematical model teaching using inquiry-based learning. In Understanding Digital Industry (pp. 180-183).Routledge.

  • Beneroso, D., & Erans, M. (2020). Team-based learning: an ethnicity-focused study on the perceptions of teamwork abilities of engineering students. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1-12.

  • Bhat, S., Raju, R., Bhat, S., & D’Souza, R. (2020). Redefining quality in engineering education through the flipped classroom model. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 906-914.

  • Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Cognitive domain.

  • Carrasco, G. A., Behling, K. C., & Lopez, O. (2021). Weekly team-based learning scores and participation are better predictors of successful course performance than case-based learning performance: role of assessment incentive structure. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 521. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02948-6

  • Cestone, C. M., Levine, R. E., & Lane, D. R. (2008). Peer assessment and evaluation in team-based learning. New directions for teaching and learning, 2008 (116), 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.334

  • Dam, L. (1990). Learner autonomy in practice: An experiment in learning and teaching (I. Gathercole, Ed.).Bourne Press.

  • Duarte, M., Leite, C., & Mouraz, A. (2016). The effect of curricular activities on learner autonomy: the perspective of undergraduate mechanical engineering students. European Journal of Engineering Education, 41(1), 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2015.105610 1

  • Gren, L. (2020). A flipped classroom approach to teaching empirical software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Education, 63(3), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2019.2960264

  • Gullo, C., Ha, T. C., & Cook, S. (2015). Twelve tips for facilitating team-based learning. Medical Teacher, 37 (9), 819-824. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.1001729

  • Hass, A., Laverie, D. A., & Cours Anderson, K. (2021). Let’s be independent together: Enabling student autonomy with team based learning activities in a flipped class. Marketing Education Review, 31 (2), 147-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2020.1853572

  • Huitt, T. W., Killins, A., & Brooks, W. S. (2015). Team‐based learning in the gross anatomy laboratory improves academic performance and students' attitudes toward teamwork. Anatomical Sciences Education, 8(2), 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1460

  • Kibble, J. D., Bellew, C., Asmar, A., & Barkley, L. (2016). Team-based learning in large enrollment classes. Advances in Physiology Education, 40 (4), 435-442. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00095.2016

  • Koles, P. G., Stolfi, A., Borges, N. J., Nelson, S., & Parmelee, D. X. (2010). The impact of team-based learning on medical students' academic performance. Academic Medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 85 (11), 1739-1745. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f52bed

  • Kumar, A., Mantri, A., & Dutta, R. (2021). Development of an augmented reality-based scaffold to improve the learning experience of engineering students in embedded system course. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29 (1), 244-257. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22245

  • Lino-Neto, T., Ribeiro, E., Rocha, M., & Costa, M. J. (2021). Going virtual and going wide: comparing Team-Based Learning in-class versus online and across disciplines. Education and Information Technologies, 1-19.

  • Littlewood, W. (1996). “Autonomy”: An anatomy and a framework. System, 24(4), 427-435.

  • Michaelsen, L. K., & Sweet, M. (2008). The essential elements of team‐based learning. New directions for teaching and learning, 2008(116), 7-27. https:// doi.org/10.1002/tl.330

  • Mitchell, J. E., & Rogers, L. (2020). Staff perceptions of implementing project-based learning in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 45(3), 349-362.

  • Monroy Reyes, A., Vergara Villegas, O. O., Miranda Bojórquez, E., Cruz Sánchez, V. G., & Nandayapa, M. (2016). A mobile augmented reality system to support machinery operations in scholar environments. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 24(6), 967-981. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21772

  • Najdanovic-Visak, V. (2017). Team-based learning for first year engineering students. Education forChemical Engineers, 18, 26-34.

  • Opriş,I.,Costinaş, S.,Ionescu,C. S., & Gogoaşe Nistoran, D. E. (2018). Step-by-step augmented reality in power engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education , 26 (5), 1590-1602. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21969

  • Patil, S. S., Lokare, V. T., & Kulkarni, S. S. (2022). Exploring Online Teaching-Learning during COVID-19: A Comparative Study of Team Based Learning and Non-Team Based Learning. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 35(SpecialIssue 1).

  • Radzali, U. S., Mohd-Yusof, K., & Phang, F. A. (2018). Changing the conception of teaching from teacher-centred to student-centred learning among engineering lecturers. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 20(2), 120-126.

  • Rajalingam, P.,Rotgans,J.I., Zary, N., Ferenczi, M. A., Gagnon, P., & Low-Beer, N. (2018). Implementation of team-based learning on a large scale: Three factors to keep in mind. Medical Teacher, 40 (6), 582-588. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.14516 30

  • Restall, G. C., & Clark, M. C. (2021). Team-based learning and the community of inquiry model. New directions for teaching and learning, 2021 (165), 65-76. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20437

  • Salimath, S., Vijaylakshmi, M., & Shettar, A. S. (2018). A comparative study of Team Based Learning and individual learning. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 31 (Special Issue). https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2018/v0i0/120891

  • Seidel, R., & Godfrey, E. (2005). Project and team based learning: An integrated approach to engineering education. 4th Global Colloquium on EngineeringEducation,Brisbane, Qld.

  • Selek, M., & Kıymaz, Y.E. (2020). Implementation of the augmented reality to electronic practice. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(2), 420-434. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22204

  • Tsai, M.-F., Shieh, B.-S., Sheu, C.-C., Tsai, K.-L., Liu, K.-M., & Tsai, J.-C. (2020). Exploring medical students' learning experience in Team-Based Learning (TBL): A longitudinal evaluation. Journal of Medical Education, 24(2), 73-85. https://doi.org/10.6145/jme.20200624(2).0 001

  • Wang,Y.-W., & Hsieh,J.-G.(2010). Introducing Team-Based Learning [Introducing Team-Based Learning]. Journal of Medical Education, 14(1), 79-89. https://doi.org/10.6145/jme.201003_14(1).0009

  • Wang, Y., Ong, S. K., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2018). Enhancing mechanisms education through interaction with augmented reality simulation. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(5), 1552-1564. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21951

  • Whitley, H. P., Bell, E., Eng, M., Fuentes, D. G., Helms, K. L., Maki, E. D., & Vyas, D. (2015). Practical Team-Based Learning from planning to implementation. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(10), 149. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7910149

  • Wu, J.-W., & Chiu, A.-F. (2021). Application of Team-Based Learning in a medical nursing english course [Application of Team-Based Learning in a Medical Nursing English Course]. The Journal of Nursing, 68(2), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.6224/jn.202104_68(2).07

  • Wu, T.-T., & Wu, Y.-T.(2020).Applying project-based learning and SCAMPER teaching strategies in engineering education to explore the influence of creativity on cognition, personal motivation, and personality traits. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100631


Abstract Views: 158

PDF Views: 0




  • Learner Autonomy in Team-Based Learning : A Case Study of Mechanical Engineering Education

Abstract Views: 158  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Yu-Sheng Lin
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Tainan, Taiwan, Province of China
Yu-Hsuan Lin
Department of Economics, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of

Abstract


Team-based learning (TBL) has been increasingly applied in engineering and science education over the past decade. This study explores a particular TBL approach used in a mechanical engineering module for second-year undergraduates in Taiwan. The results of a survey on these students’ learner autonomy (LA), perceptions of TBL, engagement with TBL, self-reported contributions and concerns about TBL activities were analyzed along with their academic performance. The results suggested that LA played a crucial role in TBL, especially contribution to group work, and that classroom implementations should therefore make it a priority to boost LA. In addition, positive reciprocity was found to be operating during group work. Group differences were found in issues the students expressed concern about. Students who cared about fairness had higher LA and were more likely to contribute to team tasks whilst some students could have been less engaged in group activities due to poor organizational structure. Several challenges were also observed in this study. They included passive learners, classroom-management problems, free-riding, and limited resources. Based on our findings, we recommend that engineering instructors encourage student-teacher communication by using bonus-point incentives, student experts, peer evaluation and group competitions.

Keywords


Learner Autonomy, Team-Based Learning, Mechanical Engineering Education, Taiwan.

References