Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Performance Analysis of Conventional and Innovative Teaching Learning Methodologies in Engineering
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Imparting engineering education to millennial learners is a challenge for the educators. An innovative teaching method, namely, MILA (Multiple Interactive Learning Algorithm), was developed and implemented for an experimental set of learners of second year undergraduate learners of Electronics and Communication Engineering. The one-hour class session was broken into three twenty minutes sub sessions. Activity for each sub session was planned for effective learning. Revision period was included before the summative assessment. The performance of learners was assessed for a period of one semester, by way of Internal Assessments and End Semester Examination. The learners were observed to be very enthusiastic in learning and actively participated in the activities. The level of understanding the concepts improved which was evident in the end semester results. The learners who underwent conventional methods of teaching gave a pass percentage of 76.26, while the experimental set of learners gave a pass percentage of 84.03. Thus, proving the need for a paradigm shift.
Keywords
Multiple Interactive Learning Algorithm (MILA), Active Learning, T-Test.
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- Barbara J. Millis, Active Learning Strategies in Face-to-Face Courses, IDEA PAPER #53. Passingham, Rowe, and Sakai , 2013, pp 1-8.
- Dr. Deepak Nallaswamy V, Dr. Vivek Narayan, Dr.T N Umamaheswari, Dr. Jayanth Kumar and Dr Sreedevi, Multiple Interactive Learning Algorithm (MILA) in Teaching Oral Medicine and Radiology, International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, Vol 14, Issue 02, 2022, pp.1847 – 1858.
- Dr. R . Senthil, Enhancement of Engineering Education by incorporating Active Learning Methodologies, Journal of engineering Education & Transformation, Vol.34, Issue: No:1, July 2020, pp 12-20.
- N. Vijaya kumar, Praveen Kumar Petkar , Madhusudhana H K G Jangali Satish,Integrated Learning Experience through Activity Based Learning in UG Courses. Journal of engineering Education & Transformation, 34(3) January 2021, pp.16-24.
- Michael Joseph Prince and Richard M. Felder, Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases, Journal of Engineering Education vol. 95, No 2, 2006, pp,123-138.
- Lilia Halim, Ruhizan M. Yasin, & Azaman ishar , CAMED: An Innovative Communication Tool in Teaching Engineering Drawing, WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications, Vol.39, No:2, Feb 2012, pp 58-67.
- Richard M. Felder and Rebecca Brent, Navigating The Bumpy Road to Student-Centered Instruction, College Teaching, Vol. 44, No. 2 (Spring, 1996), pp. 43-47.
- Richard M. Felder, Rebecca Brent, ACTIVE LEARNING: AN INTRODUCTION, ASQ Higher Education Brief, 2(4), August 2009.
- S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth, Active Learning increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering,and Mathematics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. Vol.111, No.23, 2014, pp. 8410- 8415.
- Tiia Rüütmann, Hants Kipper, Teaching Strategies for Direct and Indirect Instruction in Teaching Engineering. Ilorin Journal of Economic Policy, 1(3)37-44. 2011, http://dx.doi.org/ijep.v1i3.1805 Crouch.
- Yingmin Liu, Yuyuan Li, Xueran Cui, Haikun Jinjing Wang and Yan Zhang, Clinical study on flipped classroom and mind map in newly recruited nurses’ pre-job training, BMC Nursing, 21(72), 2022, pp 1-6, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00843-z.
Abstract Views: 156
PDF Views: 0