Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Building a Course Portfolio with Industry-Institute Collaboration


Affiliations
1 KLE Technological University, Hubli-31, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The effective integration strategies of blended learning with traditional, designed a decade ago and proven effective, scalable, and flexible, now put forth several other challenges with delivery and evaluation. Especially for the elective courses, they demand assessments that add value to the course and the student's resume. The principles of elective design, the delivery tools, and techniques, the number of students, the significance of the course, etc., are some of the major evaluation parameters to be considered for the design of assessment strategies. This paper presents one such evaluation methodology, portfolio design, for the courses delivered in a blended learning model, which can also be adapted to the offline learning model. The model involved problem analysis, concept relation, design thinking, solution approaches, implementation, and presentation in the form of a portfolio. The portfolios were created online using various open source tools. The paper presents the model and design goals in detail. The first offering of the course had course projects, and the second offering had portfolio creation. The grades and attainment have improved in the second offering compared to the first one. There is also improvement in the course attainment where course learning objectives have remained the same. Portfolios are an effective strategy to evaluate one's course understanding. Portfolios can be an effective way to present the course realizations to the community as justified through the t-test analysis.

Keywords

Assessment, Blended-Learning, Elective Design, Portfolio.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Arnove, R. F. (1980). Comparative education and world-systems analysis. Comparative education review, 24(1), 48-62.

  • Bhattacharya, M., & Hartnett, M. (2007). E-portfolio assessment in higher education. In 2007 37th annual frontiers in education conference-global engineering: knowledge without borders, opportunities without passports (pp. T1G-19). IEEE.

  • Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2012). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Brandt, M. W. (2010). Portfolio choice problems. In Handbook of financial econometrics: Tools and techniques (pp. 269-336). North-Holland.

  • Campbell, D. M., Melenyzer, B. J., Nettles, D. H., & Wyman Jr, R. M. (1999). Portfolio and performance assessment in teacher education.

  • Christy, A. D., & Lima, M. (1998). The use of student portfolios in engineering instruction. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(2), 143-148.

  • Elliott, N. (2003). Portfolio creation, action research and the learning environment: A study from probation. Qualitative Social Work, 2(3), 327-345.

  • Endacott, R., Gray, M. A., Jasper, M. A., McMullan, M., Miller, C., Scholes, J., & Webb, C. (2004). Using portfolios in the assessment of learning and competence: the impact of four models. Nurse education in practice, 4(4), 250-257.

  • Gronlund, G. (1998). Portfolios as an assessment tool: Is collection of work enough?. Implementation Program: Teacher Guide, 266.

  • Guri-Rosenblit, S., Šebková, H., & Teichler, U. (2007). Massification and diversity of higher education systems: Interplay of complex dimensions. Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 373-389.

  • Hameed, S., Badii, A., & Cullen, A. J. (2008). Effective e-learning integration with traditional learning in a blended learning environment. In European and Mediterranean conference on information systems (Vol. 60, p. 14).

  • Harris, S., Dolan, G., & Fairbairn, G. (2001). Reflecting on the use of student portfolios. Nurse education today, 21(4), 278-286.

  • Hegade, P., Patil, N., & Bidari, I. (2021). Principles of Elective Design with Industry-Institute Collaboration. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 34, 384-390.

  • Hoic-Bozic, N., Mornar, V., & Boticki, I. (2008). A blended learning approach to course design and implementation. IEEE transactions on education, 52(1), 19-30.

  • Imhof, M., & Picard, C. (2009). Views on using portfolio in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 149-154.

  • Kaur, M. (2013). Blended learning-its challenges and future. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 93, 612-617.

  • Kim, T. K. (2015). T test as a parametric statistic. Korean journal of anesthesiology, 68(6), 540-546.

  • Larreamendy-Joerns, J., & Leinhardt, G. (2006). Going the distance with online education. Review of educational research, 76(4), 567-605.

  • Ma, L., & Lee, C. S. (2021). Evaluating the effectiveness of blended learning using the ARCS model. Journal of computer assisted learning, 37(5), 1397-1408.

  • McMullan, M., Endacott, R., Gray, M. A., Jasper, M., Miller, C. M., Scholes, J., & Webb, C. (2003). Portfolios and assessment of competence: a review of the literature. Journal of advanced nursing, 41(3), 283-294.

  • Mokhtaria, L. (2015). The use of portfolio as an assessment tool. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 4(07), 170-72.

  • Paulson, F. L. (1991). What Makes a Portfolio a Portfolio?. Educational leadership, 48(5), 60-63.

  • Picciano, A. G., Dziuban, C. D., Graham, C. R., & Moskal, P. D. (Eds.). (2021). Blended Learning: Research Perspectives, Volume 3.

  • Precel, K., Eshet-Alkalai, Y., & Alberton, Y. (2009). Pedagogical and design aspects of a blended learning course. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(2).

  • Procter, C. T. (2003). Blended learning in practice, 1-6.

  • Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701.

  • Singh, H. (2021). Building effective blended learning programs. In Challenges and Opportunities for the Global Implementation of E-Learning Frameworks. USA: IGI Global, 15-23.

  • Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020). The flipped classroom: A meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels. Educational Research Review, 30, 100314.

  • Syzdykova, Z., Koblandin, K., Mikhaylova, N., & Akinina, O. (2021). Assessment of E-portfolio in higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(2), 120-134.

  • Tillema, H. H. (2001). Portfolios as developmental assessment tools. International journal of training and development, 5(2), 126-135.

  • Udo-Imeh, P. T., Edet, W. E., & Anani, R. B. (2012). Portfolio analysis models: A review. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(18), 101-120.


Abstract Views: 160

PDF Views: 0




  • Building a Course Portfolio with Industry-Institute Collaboration

Abstract Views: 160  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Prakash Hegade
KLE Technological University, Hubli-31, India
Nirmala Patil
KLE Technological University, Hubli-31, India
Namita Kanthi
KLE Technological University, Hubli-31, India

Abstract


The effective integration strategies of blended learning with traditional, designed a decade ago and proven effective, scalable, and flexible, now put forth several other challenges with delivery and evaluation. Especially for the elective courses, they demand assessments that add value to the course and the student's resume. The principles of elective design, the delivery tools, and techniques, the number of students, the significance of the course, etc., are some of the major evaluation parameters to be considered for the design of assessment strategies. This paper presents one such evaluation methodology, portfolio design, for the courses delivered in a blended learning model, which can also be adapted to the offline learning model. The model involved problem analysis, concept relation, design thinking, solution approaches, implementation, and presentation in the form of a portfolio. The portfolios were created online using various open source tools. The paper presents the model and design goals in detail. The first offering of the course had course projects, and the second offering had portfolio creation. The grades and attainment have improved in the second offering compared to the first one. There is also improvement in the course attainment where course learning objectives have remained the same. Portfolios are an effective strategy to evaluate one's course understanding. Portfolios can be an effective way to present the course realizations to the community as justified through the t-test analysis.

Keywords


Assessment, Blended-Learning, Elective Design, Portfolio.

References