Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Integrated Laboratory Practices in the Question Papers


Affiliations
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Thakur College of Engineering and Technology, Kandivali (E), India
2 Department of Electronic Engineering, Thakur College of Engineering and Technology, Kandivali, India
3 Department of Computer Science Engineering, Thakur College of Engineering and Technology, Kandivali(E), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Laboratory classes are an essential part of an engineering course. Laboratory sessions are primarily designed to develop proficiency in technical skills, offer an opportunity to place theory in context, develop critical thinking skills and promote investigation-based learning. Laboratory experiences will help to develop as independent learners, researchers, critical thinkers, and generators of knowledge. There are several improvements that need to be implemented to improve student laboratory experiences. The purpose of this research is to integrate with end semester examination in view of requirements of the 21st century. This paper highlight the evaluation system which is robust and dynamic as compared to the traditional evaluation system. This research is based on the feedback collected from industrialists and academicians on the present examination system. The paper has come up with the result that 50 % of academicians are of the opinion that examination paper patterns should include the laboratory-based question. The paper highlights the curriculum design aspect related to the question paper setting. The paper brings some critical points related to the integration of laboratory conduct and evaluation system with end semester examination.

Keywords

Laboratory Work, Learner, Knowledge, Integration, Examination, Evaluation.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • .ABET, Guidelines and application for provisional status in the Washington Accord. 2003. http://www.washingtonaccord.org/wash_accor trans.html,http://www.washingtonaccord.org/

  • . Lattuca, L.R., P.T. Terenzini, and J.F. Volkwein, Engineering Change: A Study of the Impact of EC2000. 2006: ABET. http://www.abet.org/papers.shtml

  • . Brown, N.J. and O.T. Brown, Mechatronics: a graduate perspective. Journal of Mechatronics, 2002. 12(2): p. 159-167.

  • . Lucena, J.C., Globalisation and organizational change: engineers experiences and their implications for engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 2006. 31(3): p. 321-338.

  • . Sivakumar, S.C., et al., A web-based remote interactive laboratory for Internetworking education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 2005. 48(4): p. 586-598.

  • . Feisel, L.D. and A.J. Rosa, The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 2005. 94(1).

  • . Trevelyan, J.P., Technical Coordination in Engineering Practice. Journal of Engineering Education, 2007. 96(3): p. 191-204.

  • . Arpaia, P., et al., A remote measurement laboratory for educational experiments. Measurement, 1997. 21(4): p. 157-169.

  • Lindsay, E. and M. Good, Razali, Z.B. and Trevelyan, J.P., Valuable Experience in Engineering Laboratory: enhance understanding of engineering concepts. Outcomes. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Education, 2005. 48(4): p. 619-631.

  • Somech, A. and B. Ronit, Tacit knowledge in academia: Its effects on student learning. Journal of Psychology, 1999. 133(6): p. 605- 617.

  • Leornard, N. and G.S. Insch, Tacit Knowledge in Academia: A Proposed Model and Measurement Scale. Journal of Psychology, 2005. 139(6): p. 495-512.

  • . Ree, M.J. and J.A. Earles, Intelligence Is The Best Predictor Of Job Performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1992. June: p. 86-89.

  • Sternberg, R.J., L. Okagaki, and A.S. Jackson, Practical intelligence for success in school. Educational Leadership, 1990. 48(1): p. 35- 39.

  • Wagner, R.K. and R.J. Sternberg, Practical intelligence in real-world pursuits: The role of tacit knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985. 49: p. 436-458.

  • Webb, A., Design of a Thermofluids Pump Laboratory, in School of Mechanical Engineering. 2003, The University of Western Australia.: Perth.

  • Christiansen, F.V. and C. Rump, Getting it right: conceptual development from student to experienced engineer. European Journal of Engineering Education, 2007. 32(4): p. 467- 479

  • Rameshaiah, G.N., Suneetha, Y.K., Siddiqui, S., Sriraman, A. and Prabhu, N., Outcomes of Laboratory Experimentation in the Chemical Engineering Curriculum.

  • Christiansen, F.V. and Rump, C., 2007. Getting it right: conceptual development from student to experienced engineer. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(4), pp.467-479.

  • Corter, J.E., Nickerson, J.V., Esche, S.K. and Chassapis, C., 2004, October. Remote versus hands-on labs: A comparative study. In 34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004. (pp. F1G-


Abstract Views: 98

PDF Views: 0




  • Integrated Laboratory Practices in the Question Papers

Abstract Views: 98  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Khandare V. Ninad
Department of Civil Engineering, Thakur College of Engineering and Technology, Kandivali (E), India
Kasturiwale P. Hemant
Department of Electronic Engineering, Thakur College of Engineering and Technology, Kandivali, India
Sedamkar R. Raghvendra
Department of Computer Science Engineering, Thakur College of Engineering and Technology, Kandivali(E), India

Abstract


Laboratory classes are an essential part of an engineering course. Laboratory sessions are primarily designed to develop proficiency in technical skills, offer an opportunity to place theory in context, develop critical thinking skills and promote investigation-based learning. Laboratory experiences will help to develop as independent learners, researchers, critical thinkers, and generators of knowledge. There are several improvements that need to be implemented to improve student laboratory experiences. The purpose of this research is to integrate with end semester examination in view of requirements of the 21st century. This paper highlight the evaluation system which is robust and dynamic as compared to the traditional evaluation system. This research is based on the feedback collected from industrialists and academicians on the present examination system. The paper has come up with the result that 50 % of academicians are of the opinion that examination paper patterns should include the laboratory-based question. The paper highlights the curriculum design aspect related to the question paper setting. The paper brings some critical points related to the integration of laboratory conduct and evaluation system with end semester examination.

Keywords


Laboratory Work, Learner, Knowledge, Integration, Examination, Evaluation.

References