Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Impact of Multiple Entry & Exit System on Future Engineering Education in India – Theoretical Perspectives


Affiliations
1 Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering & Technology, Chittoor, AP, India
2 Professor, Department of Computer Sci. & Engg., KG Reddy College of Engineering & Technology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
3 Assistant Professor, Department of English, Sree Vidyanikethan Engineering College (Autonomous), Tirupati, AP, India
4 Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering & Technology, Chittoor, AP, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Impact of Multiple Entry & Exit System on Future Engineering Education in India – Theoretical Perspectives Being aware that the Indian education system is undergoing a comprehensive transformation because of the implementation of the third major National Education policy-2020, a third major educational policy. Higher education, in particular, engineering education is not an exception to this. As a major policy envisage, the Multiple Entry & Exit (MEE) system is being implemented in higher education expected to have a significant impact on engineering education in India. The MEE gives emphasis on authorizing 'academic flexibility' to the student in the choice of subjects for the programs that lead to an award of a certificate, diploma & degree, and 'academic pathways' that allow the student to exit and rejoin the program at later stages without losing credits gained for the courses already completed. The policy envisions expected to transform the future higher education system, including engineering education, especially permitting the student to exit the program at the end of the first, second, or subsequent year of the program of the study, and rejoin at later stages either within the same engineering institution or other engineering institutions allowing seamless student mobility between or within the engineering institutions. Through a system of credit recognition by the statutory bodies, credits accumulation through an academic bank of credits (ABC), transfer of credits across the engineering institutions, and redemption of the credits to recommend an award of certificates, diplomas, degrees, 'MEE' system will be a gamechanger in engineering education. The article discusses the policy focus on the 'MEE' and its impact on future engineering education in India.

Keywords

Higher education; Education transformations, Multiple Entry & Exit; Education Policy.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Akan Akanksha Mishra, Ms. Pragati Sethi, Industry Relevant Curriculum Design in Engineering in India: A Case Study. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations , Volume 33 , No. 2, October 2019, ISSN 2349-2473, e-ISSN 2394-(2019).

  • Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 161–186. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4752(96)00015-1

  • Damodaram, A. K., Tulasi, L., & Reddy, V. (2021). Covid-19 Situations - Role of Educators in Understanding and Sustenance of Teaching- Learning Practices. Industrial Engineering Journal, 12, 37–41.

  • Dodds, A. (2008). How does globalisation interact with higher education? The continuing lack of consensus. Comparative Education, 4 4 ( 4 ) , 5 0 5 – 5 1 7 . doi:10.1080/03050060802481538

  • Ead, H. A. (2019). Globalization in higher education in Egypt in a historical context. Research in Globalization, 1(100003), 100003. doi:10.1016/j.resglo.2019.100003

  • Goodman, Roger, Takehiko Kariya, and John Taylor. Role of the State and the Future of Higher Education in the UK, Japan and Continental Europe (Workshop) (2011 : Oxford. (2012). Higher education and the state: Changing relationships in Europe and East Asia

  • Grosemans, I., Coertjens, L., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Exploring learning and fit in the transition from higher education to the labour market: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 2 1 , 6 7 – 8 4 . doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2017.03.001

  • N E P -2020 DOCUMENT . ( n . d . ) . Https://Www.Education.Gov.in/Sites/Upload_f iles/Mhrd/Files/NEP_Final_English_0.Pdf. Retrieved December 25 , 2021 , f r o m https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_file s/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf

  • MEA Annual Report . ( n . d . ) . Http://Www.Mea.Gov.in/Uploads/Publication Do cs / 33 569 _ME A _a nnu al _Re por t. P df . Retrieved December 2 1 , 2021 , from http://www.mea.gov.in/Uploads/PublicationDo cs/33569_MEA_annual_Report.pdf

  • N E P . ( 2 0 2 0 ) . http://Www.Niepa.Ac.in/Download/NEP%202 020%20Implementation%20Strategy_W.Pdf. Retrieved December from 2021 http://www.niepa.ac.in/download/NEP%20202 0%20Implementation%20Strategy_W.pdf. Implementation Strategies, published by the Registrar, National Institute of Educational Planning & Administration, New Delhi, India, 2020. (n.d.).

  • Jossberger, H., Brand-Gruwel, S., Boshuizen, H., & van de Wiel, M. (2010). The challenge of self‐directed and self‐regulated learning in vocational education: a theoretical analysis and synthesis of requirements. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 62(4), 415–440. doi:10.1080/13636820.2010.523479

  • Krajewska, A. (2020), & University of Bialystok, Faculty of Education. (2020). Globalization and higher education: The Polish perspective. Eastern European Journal of Tran sn at i on al R el at i on s, 4 (1) , 15 –31 . doi:10.15290/eejtr.2020.04.01.01

  • Lane, J. E. (2011). Importing private higher education: International branch campuses. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 13(4), 367–381. doi:10.1080/13876988.2011.583106

  • Marginson, S. (2010). Higher education in the global knowledge economy. Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(5), 6962–6980. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.05.049

  • Mazzarol, T., Kemp, S., Savery, L., Australian International Education Foundation, & Curtin University of Technology. Curtin Business School. Institute for Research into International Competitiveness. (1996). International students who choose not to study in Australia : an examinat ion of Taiwan and Indonesia. Canberra, Australia: AEIF Policy Research and Analysis Section.

  • Mazzarol, Tim, & Soutar, G. N. (2002). “Push‐pull” factors influencing international student destination choice. International Journal of Educational Management, 16(2), 82–90. doi:10.1108/09513540210418403

  • Naik, Naik, B. M. (2020). Role of Indian universities and colleges vital in employment generation can they afford to ignore? At what cost? Who pays? Nations which lead in innovation take away jobs from those who lag. Journal of Engineering Education Transformation , 33 ( 4 ) , 45 – 49 . doi:10.16920/jeet/2020/v33i4/153160

  • Perez-Encinas, A., Rodriguez-Pomeda, J., & de Wit, H. (2021). Factors influencing student mobility: a comparative European study. Studies in Higher Education, 46 ( 1 2) , 2528 – 2541 . doi:10.1080/03075079.2020.1725873

  • Sharif, R. (2019). The relations between acculturation and creativity and innovation in higher education: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 28(100287), 100287. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100287

  • Smith, B. E., Derek, O., Douglas, H., & Fisher, K. E. (2013). Wrapping a MOOC: Student perceptions of an experiment in Blended Learning. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 187–199.

  • Teichler, U. (2015). Higher education research. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 862–869). Elsevier.

  • Ti g h t , M. ( 2 0 2 1 ) . Globalisation and internationalization as frameworks for higher education research. Research Papers inEducation , 36 ( 1 ) , 52 – 74 . doi:10.1080/02671522.2019.1633560

  • UGC-Guidelines – 2022- Transforming Higher Education Institutions in to Multidisciplinary Institutions - https://www.ugc.gov.in/pdfnews/5599305_Gui delines-for-Transforming-Higher-Education- Institutions - into- Multidisiplinary Institutions.pdf

  • (2021). National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 and SCSVMV. CSIT 9, 11-15 (2021).

  • V., Kannan. (2021). National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 and SCSVMV. CSIT 9, 11-15 (2021).

  • Volet, S. (1999). Learning across cultures: appropriateness of knowledge transfer. International Journal of Educational Research, 3 1 ( 7 ) , 625-643. doi : 10 . 1016 / s0883 - 0355(99)00028-2


Abstract Views: 101

PDF Views: 1




  • Impact of Multiple Entry & Exit System on Future Engineering Education in India – Theoretical Perspectives

Abstract Views: 101  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

A. K. Damodaram
Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering & Technology, Chittoor, AP, India
L. Venkateswara Reddy
Professor, Department of Computer Sci. & Engg., KG Reddy College of Engineering & Technology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
U. Ravindra Babu
Assistant Professor, Department of English, Sree Vidyanikethan Engineering College (Autonomous), Tirupati, AP, India
M. Mohan Babu
Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering & Technology, Chittoor, AP, India

Abstract


Impact of Multiple Entry & Exit System on Future Engineering Education in India – Theoretical Perspectives Being aware that the Indian education system is undergoing a comprehensive transformation because of the implementation of the third major National Education policy-2020, a third major educational policy. Higher education, in particular, engineering education is not an exception to this. As a major policy envisage, the Multiple Entry & Exit (MEE) system is being implemented in higher education expected to have a significant impact on engineering education in India. The MEE gives emphasis on authorizing 'academic flexibility' to the student in the choice of subjects for the programs that lead to an award of a certificate, diploma & degree, and 'academic pathways' that allow the student to exit and rejoin the program at later stages without losing credits gained for the courses already completed. The policy envisions expected to transform the future higher education system, including engineering education, especially permitting the student to exit the program at the end of the first, second, or subsequent year of the program of the study, and rejoin at later stages either within the same engineering institution or other engineering institutions allowing seamless student mobility between or within the engineering institutions. Through a system of credit recognition by the statutory bodies, credits accumulation through an academic bank of credits (ABC), transfer of credits across the engineering institutions, and redemption of the credits to recommend an award of certificates, diplomas, degrees, 'MEE' system will be a gamechanger in engineering education. The article discusses the policy focus on the 'MEE' and its impact on future engineering education in India.

Keywords


Higher education; Education transformations, Multiple Entry & Exit; Education Policy.

References