Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Innovative Teaching-Learning Method for Engineering Mathematics Through Video Lectures in Rural Areas


Affiliations
1 Vidya Pratishthan's Kamalnayan Bajaj Institute of Engineering and Technology Baramati S.P. University of Pune, Vidyanagari, Baramati, Maharashtra, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Mathematics is an important subject required for the foundation and has applications in all branches of engineering. Mathematical knowledge and skills are required for higher study, developing new technology and innovations. But creating students' interest in learning activities is always a challenging task for every mathematics teacher. Many engineering students are failing in the first year of their studies. This problem becomes more important and challenging in rural areas. There is always a concern about the problem that why students are not taking interest in learning? Out of many possible ways to deal with this problem, the use of flipped classrooms (FCR) plays an important role. This paper deals with the use of FCR for engineering students from rural areas. In addition to classroom teaching, for technology-based learning, video lectures (VLs) are provided to students of first-year engineering for the subject of engineering mathematics. Starting with a review of FCR, experimentation of VLs, and its impact on learning activities and result has been presented. Various surveys at different levels and examination results are considered for conclusions. Through this action research, we have shown that VL is one of the most useful tools for enhancing learning and improving the results of students in rural areas. It has been further shown that this method is very much accepted by students.

Keywords

Educational technology, Mathematics learning, Short VLs, Flipped classroom, Engineering Education.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Abdelha kAqqala , Asmaa Elhannania , Abdelfatteh Haidinea, Aziz Dahbi (2017). a. Improving the Teaching of ICT Engineering using Flipped Learning: a personalized model and a case study, Production, 27, (spe), e20162274, 2017 | DOI: 10.1590/0103- 6513.227416, 1-16.
  • Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). a. Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale, and a call for research. Higher Education Research and Development , 34 ( 1 ) , 1 – 14 . b . https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
  • AICTE (2020): a. https: //facilities . aicte - india.org/dashboard/pages/dashboardaicte.php
  • Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). a. The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. D.C.D. van Alten, et al., Educational Research Review 28 (2019) 100281 15 compedu.2018.07.021
  • Aliye Karabulut-Ilgu, Nadia Jaramillo Cherrez, and Charles T. Jahren (2018). a. A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education, British Journal of Educational Technology Vol 49 No. 3, 398–411.
  • A zeem Uni ssa , Aishwa rya Go pakumar, Vaishnavi Rao (2018). a.Exploring Blended Flipped Classroom for syllabus Coverage, Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 32 (2), 15-18.
  • Baker, J.W. (2000). a."The 'Classroom Flip": Using Web course management tools to become the Guide by the Side." In J. A. Chambers (Ed.), Selected papers from the 11th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning, 9-17. Jacksonville, FL: Florida Community College at Jacksonville.
  • Bart, M. (2013). a. The survey confirms the growth of the FCR. Faculty Focus. Retrieved April 21, 2016, from http://www.facultyfocus. com/articles/edtech-news-and-trends/surveyconfirms- growth-ofthe- flipped-classroom/
  • Batra Shefali, Sharma S. R., Kumra Neha, Gupta a. Traditional vs E-Teaching Learning Due to Covid-19: A Case Study for Mathematics Course, Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 35 (1), 80-87.
  • Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). a. Flipy our classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Alexandria, Va: International Society for Technology in Education.
  • Bhagat, K. K., Chang, C. N., & Chang, C. Y. (2016). a. The Impact of the Flipped Classroom on Mathematics Concept Learning in High School. Educational Technology & Society, 19 (3), 124–132.
  • Biggs, J. B. (2011). a. Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). a. Teaching for quality learning at university. What the student does (4th ed.). Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
  • Blerta Prevalla, Huseyin Uzunboylu (2019). a. Flipped Learning in Engineering education, TEM Journal Vol. 8, 656-661
  • Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Kinshuk, & Chen, N. S. (2014). a. Is FLIP enough? or should we use the FLIPPED b. model instead? Computers and Education , 79 , 16 - 27 . DOI : 10 . 1016 / j . compedu.2014.07.004.
  • Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). a. The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to ac ti ve l e arni ng out comes. Educ at i ona l Psychologist , 49( 4), 219– 243 . https : / / doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823C.
  • Crouch & E. Mazur (2001). a.Peer Instruction: Ten Years of Experience and Results, Am. J. Phys., Vol. 69, 970-977.
  • David C.D. van Alten, Chris Phielix, Jeroen Janssen, Liesbeth Kester, (2019). a. Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: A meta-analysis, Educational Research review 28 , DOI : 10.1016/j.edurev.2019.05.003
  • Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013). a. Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61 , 563 - 580 . DOI:10.1007/s11423- 013-9305-6
  • DeLozier, S. J., & Rhodes, M. G. (2017). a. Flipped classrooms: A review of key ideas and recommendations for practice. Educational Psycology Review, 29 ( 1 ) , 141 – 151 . http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9356-9.
  • Eric Mazur (1997). a. Peer Instruction: A User's Manual Series in Educational Innovation. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  • Fautch, J. M. (2015). a. The Flipped classroom for teaching organic chemistry in small classes: Is it effective? Chemistry Education Research and practice , 16 ( 1 ) , 179 - 186 . DOI:10.1039/c4rp00230j.
  • Hanna Kinnari-Korpela, (2015). a. Using short VLs to enhanc e mat hemat ics learningexperiences on differential and integral calculus course for engineering students, Informatics in education, Vol. 14, No. 1, 67-81.
  • He Shen, Nancy Warter-Perez, Jianyu Jane Dong, Nili. (2019). a. Iterative Improvement Flipped Classroom Teaching of Lower Division Engineering Courses, American Society for Engineering Education, preprint. Higher education All India state profile, 2017-18, https://www.ugc.ac.in/pdfnews/eUGC_HE%20 AIS%20Profile%20.pd
  • Hiwareka r A . P. ( 2 0 1 9 ) . Engineering Mathematics https :// www.youtube.com/channel/ UCSnkZPr4D19AK80mcooH - dA?view_as=subscriber
  • Hung, H.-T. (2015). a. Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learnong , 2 8 ( 1 ) , 81 - 96.b. DOI:10.1080/09588221.2014.967701
  • Jehad Alzabut (2017). a. On using various mathematics instructions versus traditional instructions: an AR, Journal on Mathematics Education, Vol. 8, No. 2, 133-144.
  • Johanna Inman and Simuelle Myers (2018). a. Now streaming: Strategies that improve VLs, Idea paper 68, 1- 9.
  • Johnson L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., and Freeman, A. (2014). a. NMC Horizon Report: 2014 library edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved January 10, 2016, from http://privacytools.
  • Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., and Freeman, A. (2015). a. NMC Horizon Report: 2015 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  • José A . Gómez - Tejedor ( 2020 ).a. Effectiveness of flip teaching on engineering students' performance in the physics lab. Computers & Education 144:103708 (2020), Doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103708.
  • Joshi Namrata M. (2015). a. A cceptance of MOOCs for Engineering Education in India, proc. of 10th International CALIBER-2015, 334-341.
  • Kaw A.; Hess, M. (2007). a. Comparing the Effecti veness of Instructional Delivery Modalities in an Engineering Course, International Journal of Engineering Education. 23 (3): 508–516.
  • King, Alison (1993). a. "From sage on the stage to guide on the side". College Teaching. 41 (1): 30– 35. DOI:10.1080/87567555.1993.9926781.
  • Lape, N. K., Levy, R., Yong, D. H., Haushalter, K. A., Eddy, R., & Hankel, N. (2014). a. Probing the inverted classroom: A controlled study of teaching and learning outcomes in undergraduate engineering and mathematics. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, USA, 121, 9475. https://www.asee.org/ public/conferences/32/papers/9475/download.
  • Lazakidou, G., & Retalis, S. (2010). a. Using computer-supported collaborative learning strategies for helping students acquire self-regulated problem-solving skills in mathematics. Computers & Education, 54(1), 3- 13. DOI:10.1016/j. compedu.2009.02.020.
  • Maureen Lage, Glenn Platt, Michael Treglia (2000). a. Inverting the Classroom: A gateway to creating an Inclusive Learning Environment, Journal of Economic Education, 30-43.
  • Natarajan R. (2002). a. Emerging Trends in Engineering Education –Indian Perspectives, 16th Australian International Education Conference, 1-10.
  • Neeraj Sharma (2014). a. Expansion of Engineering Education in India: Issues, Challenges and Achievable Suggestions, Journal of Academia and Industrial Research (JAIR) Volume 3, Issue 3 August 2014 . [40] Kristin Wood, Dan Jensen, Christina White (2008). a. Improving Active Learning in Engineering Education by Understanding Students, American Society for Engineering Education, 1- 22.
  • Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., & Chen, G. (2017). a. To wa rd a set o f des i gn pri n ci pl es f or mathematics flipped classrooms: A synthesis of research in mathematics education. Educational Research Review , 22 , 50 – 73 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.002.
  • Mane Suresh D., Dodamani S.P. (2015). a. Measures for Improving Undergraduate Engineering Education: An Empirical Study in the state of Karnataka, The International Journal of Engineering And Science (IJES), Volume. 4 Issue, 4, 32-38.
  • National Education Policy 2020. a. M H R D , Gov. India,https://www.mhrd.gov.in/sites/ upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0. pdf
  • National Policy on Education (2016). a. Report of the Committee for Evolution of the New Education Policy, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India.
  • O'Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). a. The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002.
  • Rafiqul Islam (2012). a. Challenges for Engineers in the New Millennium-Washington Accord, 2J. Engg. Sc. Mgmt. Ed. Vol-5 Issue-II, 452–457.6
  • Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). a.The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage b. millennial students through active learning strategies. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 105(2), 44–49.
  • Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). a. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25( 1), 54–67 . https: //doi. org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
  • Sandeep Sandhu, Michael Sankey, Patricia Donald (2019). a.Developing a Flipped classroom framework to improve tertiary education students' learning engagements in India, International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, Vol. 15, Issue 2, pp. 31-44.
  • Sangal Rajeev, Biswas Gautam, Gonsalvez Timothy, Bhattacharya Pushpak (2016). a. Motivating UG Students Towards Studies, Excerpts from the report presented at 153rd meeting of IIT Directors at IIT Mandi, 31 March.
  • Sazhin S.S. (1998). a. Teaching Mathematics to Engineering Students, Int. J. Engng Ed. Vol. 14, No. 2, pp.145-152.
  • Seery, M. K. (2015). a.Flipped learning in higher education chemistry: emerging trends and potential. directions. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 16(4), 758–768. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00136F.
  • Sharma Megha (2018). a. A Case Study: Active Learning approaches to improve learning in Electrical Network, Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 31(3), 53-57.
  • Singh Antra, Singh Seema (2014). a. P r i v a t e Engineering Education in India: Past, Present, and future, International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research (IJMSSR), Volume 3, No.11, 39-46.
  • Surender Kumar, Priya K.M. (2017). a. Strategies to Improve Engineering Education and TL Pedagogy in India, International Research Journal of Engeneering and Technology (IRJET), Volume: 04 Issue: 08, 816- 820.
  • Toqa Jameel Abbas Busebaia and Bindu John (2020). a. Can FCR enhance class engagement and academic b. performance among undergraduate pediatric nursing students? A mixed-methods study, Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 15 : 4 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-020-0124-1.
  • U G C - Annual report 2018-19 a . https://www.ugc.ac.in/pdfnews/3060779_UGCANNUAL- REPORT--ENGLISH--2018-19.pdf
  • Van den Bergh, L., Ros, A., & Beijaard, D. (2014). a. Improving teacher feedback during active learning: b. Effects of a professional development program. American Educational R esear ch Journal , 51(4), 772-809. c. https://doi.org/10.3102/000283121453132
  • Wilson, S. G. (2013). a. The Flipped Class: A Method to address the challenges of an undergraduate statistics course. The teaching of Psychology, 40( 3 ) , 193 - 199. DOI:10.1177/0098628313487461
  • Wittrock, M. C. (1992). a. Generative learning processes of the brain. Educational Psychologist, 27 , 531-541 . https : //doi.org/10.1207/ s15326985ep2704_8

Abstract Views: 88

PDF Views: 2




  • Innovative Teaching-Learning Method for Engineering Mathematics Through Video Lectures in Rural Areas

Abstract Views: 88  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

A.P. Hiwarekar
Vidya Pratishthan's Kamalnayan Bajaj Institute of Engineering and Technology Baramati S.P. University of Pune, Vidyanagari, Baramati, Maharashtra, India

Abstract


Mathematics is an important subject required for the foundation and has applications in all branches of engineering. Mathematical knowledge and skills are required for higher study, developing new technology and innovations. But creating students' interest in learning activities is always a challenging task for every mathematics teacher. Many engineering students are failing in the first year of their studies. This problem becomes more important and challenging in rural areas. There is always a concern about the problem that why students are not taking interest in learning? Out of many possible ways to deal with this problem, the use of flipped classrooms (FCR) plays an important role. This paper deals with the use of FCR for engineering students from rural areas. In addition to classroom teaching, for technology-based learning, video lectures (VLs) are provided to students of first-year engineering for the subject of engineering mathematics. Starting with a review of FCR, experimentation of VLs, and its impact on learning activities and result has been presented. Various surveys at different levels and examination results are considered for conclusions. Through this action research, we have shown that VL is one of the most useful tools for enhancing learning and improving the results of students in rural areas. It has been further shown that this method is very much accepted by students.

Keywords


Educational technology, Mathematics learning, Short VLs, Flipped classroom, Engineering Education.

References